IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nos/vgmu00/2012i2p60-77.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Budget Sector Reform: Problems, Riscs, Prospects

Author

Listed:

Abstract

The article deals with the questions of reforming the budget sector: an increase in the number of types of state and municipal institutions, and a corresponding change of mechanisms of their budgetary financing. The authors identify the main stages of the reform; analyze the specifics of each of them; examine the current state of the reform: problems, risks occurred in the course of its implementation. One of the risks is a threat of discontinuing the reform. Its sign is a steady decline in the level of economic independence of the autonomous institutions after making a number of amendments to Federal Law "On autonomous institutions". The decline is primarily associated with the norm of Law № 83-FL (№ 83-ФЗ) for the establishment of the procedure of developing and adopting a plan on financial and economic activity of an autonomous agency by its founder.Development proposals for the reform: 1) the adoption of the Federal law setting out a new look at the system to be transformed. This Act inevitably contains a lot of poorly defined, obscure notions and reference standards, according to which taking decisions on some relevant questions is authorized to the federal, regional and municipal bodies of power. Then while the Law is being implemented some of its statutory concepts and mechanisms are clarified and specified; 2) a preliminary development of a fairly detailed concept or development program of reform. Though there are obvious benefits in it, there is still a danger to drag on discussing methodological problems without passing to a real change. This threat is quite real, yet it can be removed if there is a political will and a careful, clear organization of work on the preparation of the concept.

Suggested Citation

  • Nikolay Lisin & Boris Rudnik, 2012. "Budget Sector Reform: Problems, Riscs, Prospects," Public administration issues, Higher School of Economics, issue 2, pages 60-77.
  • Handle: RePEc:nos:vgmu00:2012:i:2:p:60-77
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://vgmu.hse.ru/data/2013/01/14/1303209964/%D0%9B%D0%B8%D1%81%D0%B8%D0%BD,%20%D0%A0%D1%83%D0%B4%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BA%2060-77.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nos:vgmu00:2012:i:2:p:60-77. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Irina A. Zvereva (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://vgmu.hse.ru/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.