IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nos/vgmu00/2012i2p202-213.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of the Road and Transport Infrastructure in Moscow: From Th eory to Practice

Author

Listed:
  • O. Nekhaychik
  • Natalya Shevyrova

Abstract

This article examines problems of road and transport infrastructure of Moscow. It considers analytical models of large cities, and the transport problems of Moscow are investigated with the help of these models. A model, describing cause-effect connections between various problems of the road and transport structure of the city, is presented in the article. The study results in the definition of the priorities for the transport infrastructure development: the monopolicentric model suits more large cities such as Moscow, than the pure monocentric model. Policentric models, particularly ones with developed district centers, could become optimal for Moscow in terms of load on the road network. At such an arrangement of migration flows, employees would not have to move every day from their area to the center to work and back. The development of regional centers would create new jobs there.Conclusions: the analysis of the road and transport infrastructure of the city of Moscow has shown that in order to solve the problems in the short and medium term, the following measures may be taken: the priority for public transport; the establishment of new car parks in the area of the final metro stations; the creation of a more coherent road network in the surrounding towns; the denial of benefits for drivers by the status indication; the elimination of temporary and semi-permanent structures impeding traffic; the introduction of tightly regulated and sensitively paid parking in the city. In the long term measures to reduce the monocentricity and multi-functionality of the city are necessary to be taken.

Suggested Citation

  • O. Nekhaychik & Natalya Shevyrova, 2012. "Analysis of the Road and Transport Infrastructure in Moscow: From Th eory to Practice," Public administration issues, Higher School of Economics, issue 2, pages 202-213.
  • Handle: RePEc:nos:vgmu00:2012:i:2:p:202-213
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://vgmu.hse.ru/data/2013/01/14/1303209126/%D0%9D%D0%B5%D1%85%D0%B0%D0%B9%D1%87%D0%B8%D0%BA%20202-213.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nos:vgmu00:2012:i:2:p:202-213. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Irina A. Zvereva (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://vgmu.hse.ru/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.