IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nms/wsimit/10.5771-0342-300x-2020-5-368.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Demokratie für Deutschland, Austerität für Europa? Grenzen der Solidarität in der rechtsprechung des Bundesverfassungsgerichts

Author

Listed:
  • Farahat, Anuscheh
  • Hildebrand, Marius

Abstract

On the basis of the ruling of the European Stability Mechanism (ESM) – announced by the German Federal Constitutional Court – the article examines how constitutional resolutions of euro zone crisis-induced conflicts affect the institutionalisation of transnational solidarity in Europe. For this purpose, it is argued that the crisis-induced politicisation of European governance is understood as a reproduction and strengthening of transnational solidarity conflicts. Against this backdrop, it maps out how the court frames the supranational conditionalisation of financial solidarity towards the debtor countries inherent in the ESM as a necessary requirement of the democratic principle of the German constitution (Grundgesetz). Hence, the court does not only affirm the crisis politics of the German federal government ; it runs into a dilemma of democratic governance in Europe and closes down the interpretative openness of the constitution in a way that undermines the political leeway for institutionalising a more progressive understanding of solidarity in ­Europe.

Suggested Citation

  • Farahat, Anuscheh & Hildebrand, Marius, 2020. "Demokratie für Deutschland, Austerität für Europa? Grenzen der Solidarität in der rechtsprechung des Bundesverfassungsgerichts," WSI-Mitteilungen, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 73(5), pages 368-373.
  • Handle: RePEc:nms:wsimit:10.5771/0342-300x-2020-5-368
    DOI: 10.5771/0342-300X-2020-5-368
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nomos-elibrary.de/10.5771/0342-300X-2020-5-368
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5771/0342-300X-2020-5-368?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nms:wsimit:10.5771/0342-300x-2020-5-368. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nomos.de/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.