IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nms/wsimit/10.5771-0342-300x-2020-1-19.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Arbeitsintensität als Gegenstand empirischer Erhebungen. Das Potenzial repräsentativer Erwerbstätigenbefragungen für die Forschung

Author

Listed:
  • Hünefeld, Lena
  • Meyer, Sophie-Charlotte
  • Ahlers, Elke
  • Erol, Serife

Abstract

The potential of representative employee surveys for research The debate on work intensity and work intensification is often emotional and sensitive, not least because it is frequently accompanied by the feeling of overstrain and inadequacy on the part of the affected employees. There are also numerous indications that long-lasting work intensity at a high level can be detrimental for the employees’ health. Against this background, scholarly studies that contribute to objectifying this debate are of particular importance. For this reason, the article aims to portray avail­able representative datasets that are adequate to describe the distribution and, in particular, the determinants of work intensity in Germany. The authors compare the distribution of high work intensity across various data sets. Furthermore, they focus on empirical gaps that can be identified in current surveys against the background of more complex work environments and identify opportunities for further development.

Suggested Citation

  • Hünefeld, Lena & Meyer, Sophie-Charlotte & Ahlers, Elke & Erol, Serife, 2020. "Arbeitsintensität als Gegenstand empirischer Erhebungen. Das Potenzial repräsentativer Erwerbstätigenbefragungen für die Forschung," WSI-Mitteilungen, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 73(1), pages 19-28.
  • Handle: RePEc:nms:wsimit:10.5771/0342-300x-2020-1-19
    DOI: 10.5771/0342-300X-2020-1-19
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nomos-elibrary.de/10.5771/0342-300X-2020-1-19
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5771/0342-300X-2020-1-19?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nms:wsimit:10.5771/0342-300x-2020-1-19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nomos.de/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.