IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nms/wsimit/10.5771-0342-300x-2017-5-364.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Karrierewege und -orientierungen in Wirtschaft und Wissenschaft im Vergleich – Ausdifferenzierung vs. Zuspitzung?

Author

Listed:
  • Rogge, Jan-Christoph

Abstract

After long years of fierce debate on the reform of academic career paths in Germany this article sums up the current state of academic careers in the country. The author compares and contrasts career paths and orientations in scientific institutions with those in business corporations. The study reveals that a differentiation of career paths is underway in the corporate sector, albeit tentatively, whereas the academic sector focuses more than ever on only one goal, namely obtaining a professorship. This difference in career paths is also reflected in the career orientations of the employees. In companies the author identifies three different types of orientations that can be interpreted as reactions to very different features of the structural changes in the business world. In academia, which is characterised by intense competition among a constantly growing number of academics for an almost stagnant number of permanent posts, three orientations can also be identified. However, they differ from the responses of their peers in business because they are based on subjective perceptions of the likelihood of career success under these conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Rogge, Jan-Christoph, 2017. "Karrierewege und -orientierungen in Wirtschaft und Wissenschaft im Vergleich – Ausdifferenzierung vs. Zuspitzung?," WSI-Mitteilungen, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 70(5), pages 364-371.
  • Handle: RePEc:nms:wsimit:10.5771/0342-300x-2017-5-364
    DOI: 10.5771/0342-300X-2017-5-364
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nomos-elibrary.de/10.5771/0342-300X-2017-5-364
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5771/0342-300X-2017-5-364?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nms:wsimit:10.5771/0342-300x-2017-5-364. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nomos.de/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.