IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nms/wsimit/10.5771-0342-300x-2011-4-202.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sozialpolitik und die Hegemonie der "Hausväterökonomie". Anmerkungen zur Sozialstaatsdebatte

Author

Listed:
  • Reiners, Hartmut

Abstract

Die von Peter Sloterdijk losgetretene Debatte über die Sozialpolitik hat gezeigt, wie wenig unsere Intellektuellen über die Finanzierung des Sozialbudgets wissen. Sloterdijks Behauptung, die Besserverdienenden seien die "gebende Hand" des Wohlfahrtsstaates, ist schon deshalb falsch, weil zwei Drittel der Sozialleistungen von den Sozialversicherungen finanziert werden, in die obere Einkommensgruppen dank Beitragsbemessungs- und Versicherungspflichtgrenze entweder gar keine oder nur reduzierte Beiträge einzahlen. Sozialpolitik ist zudem schon lange keine Armenfürsorge mehr, sondern dient der Bereitstellung unverzichtbarer Infrastruktureinrichtungen moderner Gesellschaften.

Suggested Citation

  • Reiners, Hartmut, 2011. "Sozialpolitik und die Hegemonie der "Hausväterökonomie". Anmerkungen zur Sozialstaatsdebatte," WSI-Mitteilungen, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 64(4), pages 202-204.
    • Handle: RePEc:nms:wsimit:10.5771/0342-300x-2011-4-202
    DOI: 10.5771/0342-300X-2011-4-202
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nomos-elibrary.de/10.5771/0342-300X-2011-4-202
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5771/0342-300X-2011-4-202?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nms:wsimit:10.5771/0342-300x-2011-4-202. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nomos.de/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.