IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nms/nomsmr/10.5771-2511-8676-2022-4-262.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Frontline Employees’ Attitude Toward Embodied Social Robots In Customer Service: An Integrative Framework And Empirical Test

Author

Listed:
  • Ernens, Stéphanie
  • Delcourt, Cécile
  • Dessart, Laurence
  • Baiwir, Lisa

Abstract

Embodied social robots-robots providing services for and in cocreation with consumers-are expected to profoundly change the way services are delivered. Yet, their integration in customer service poses a challenge: their adoption by frontline employees (FLEs). Accordingly, this study aims to examine FLEs’ attitude toward embodied social robots and to uncover its antecedents. This work presents an integrative framework which builds upon the technology acceptance model and examines the influence of potential factors on FLEs’ attitude toward embodied social robots. An online survey among 165 FLEs is used to test the integrative framework. Despite the growing knowledge regarding customers’ perceptions of (embodied social) robots, the perspective of FLEs is under-investigated while crucial to foster FLEs’ acceptance of such robots. This research concludes with several strategies service providers can implement to possibly enhance FLEs’ attitude toward embodied social robots, and thus, to support their adoption by FLEs.

Suggested Citation

  • Ernens, Stéphanie & Delcourt, Cécile & Dessart, Laurence & Baiwir, Lisa, 2022. "Frontline Employees’ Attitude Toward Embodied Social Robots In Customer Service: An Integrative Framework And Empirical Test," SMR - Journal of Service Management Research, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 6(4), pages 262-274.
  • Handle: RePEc:nms:nomsmr:10.5771/2511-8676-2022-4-262
    DOI: 10.5771/2511-8676-2022-4-262
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nomos-elibrary.de/10.5771/2511-8676-2022-4-262
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5771/2511-8676-2022-4-262?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nms:nomsmr:10.5771/2511-8676-2022-4-262. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nomos.de/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.