IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nms/ethics/10.5771-1439-880x-2017-3-370.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

When Do Companies Have a Positive Duty to Engage in Philanthropy? An Empirical Application of Mieth’s Five Criteria for Positive Duties of Individuals in the Corporate Context

Author

Listed:
  • Schons, Laura Marie

Abstract

Although the negative duties of corporations have been intensively discussed and researched, the more elusive phenomenon of positive duties such as making an active effort to help people in need represents a major research void. On the level of individual actors, clear criteria exist to define cases of ethical failures to assist a person, or in other words, of disregarding one’⁠s positive duties. The study at hand uses a framework of criteria developed to define positive duties of individuals from contemporary deontological philosophy developed by Mieth (2012). First, the framework is transferred to the corporate level to derive normative criteria for the positive duties of corporations. Second, the author uses a quantitative-empirical approach to test the framework.

Suggested Citation

  • Schons, Laura Marie, 2017. "When Do Companies Have a Positive Duty to Engage in Philanthropy? An Empirical Application of Mieth’s Five Criteria for Positive Duties of Individuals in the Corporate Context," Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Unternehmensethik - Journal for Business, Economics & Ethics, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 18(3), pages 370-400.
  • Handle: RePEc:nms:ethics:10.5771/1439-880x-2017-3-370
    DOI: 10.5771/1439-880X-2017-3-370
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nomos-elibrary.de/10.5771/1439-880X-2017-3-370
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5771/1439-880X-2017-3-370?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nms:ethics:10.5771/1439-880x-2017-3-370. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nomos.de/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.