IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nax/conyad/v63y2018i1p21-22.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Preferences of millennials for a pictorial scale: An opportunity to engage younger generations to participate in research studies

Author

Listed:
  • Marie Leiner de la Cabada

    (Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez, México
    Texas TECH University Health Science Center, USA)

  • Patricia Jimenez Terrazas

    (Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez, México)

  • Josefa Melgar Bayardo

    (Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez, México)

  • Sitratullah Maiyegun

    (Texas TECH University Health Science Center, USA)

  • Namrata Singh

    (Texas TECH University Health Science Center, USA)

  • Jesus Peinado

    (Texas TECH University Health Science Center, USA)

Abstract

Communication tools (advertising, social media, etc.) are evolving to become increasingly more visual, driven largely by the commercial preferences of younger generations (e.g., millennials), creating promising opportunities in many areas, including research. Visuals provide an opportunity to make questionnaires and scales that are more engaging and in sync with the times. The challenge when adding visuals to questions includes choosing the best type of visual and the possibility that the changes alter the questions. Even those that are strictly visual can compromise the validity of questionnaires or scales. Visuals that include pictorial descriptions with text have been shown to be helpful and to maintain validity among those confronting communication disparities; although, studies have not specifically analized these issues among educated younger generations. The objective of this study was to analize, among college students, a pictorial and non–pictorial scale with the intent to compare psychometric propeties and to study users’ preferences between the two scales. The two scale versions (pictorial vs. non pictorial) demonstrated comparable test-retest reliability and internal consistency, and performed in theoretically predicted ways. College students preferred the pictorial format versus the original text-only version and considered the pictorial format to be friendlier, clearer, and faster to complete. Pictorial descriptions added to questions might offer advantages versus other type of visuals because pictorial descriptions have been consistently shown to have a minimal effect on the psychometrics of scales, both in pevious studies and in the present study. With the evolving progress of visual preferences for communication tools, using this strategy in questionnaires, surveys, and scales can offer a more up-to-date appearance to engage younger generations and possibly encourage participation in research studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Marie Leiner de la Cabada & Patricia Jimenez Terrazas & Josefa Melgar Bayardo & Sitratullah Maiyegun & Namrata Singh & Jesus Peinado, 2018. "Preferences of millennials for a pictorial scale: An opportunity to engage younger generations to participate in research studies," Contaduría y Administración, Accounting and Management, vol. 63(1), pages 21-22, Enero - M.
  • Handle: RePEc:nax:conyad:v:63:y:2018:i:1:p:21-22
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.cya.unam.mx/index.php/cya/article/view/984/1126
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Visual questionnaires; Pictorial descriptions; Validation; College students; Questionnaire preferences;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C80 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs - - - General
    • D91 - Microeconomics - - Micro-Based Behavioral Economics - - - Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making
    • L82 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - Entertainment; Media

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nax:conyad:v:63:y:2018:i:1:p:21-22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alberto García-Narvaez (Technical Editor) (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fcunamx.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.