Author
Listed:
- Alexandra E. Paton
(University of Michigan)
- Daniil A. Boiko
(Carnegie Mellon University)
- Jonathan C. Perkins
(University of Michigan
University of Michigan)
- Nicholas I. Cemalovic
(University of Michigan
University of Michigan)
- Thiago Reschützegger
(Federal University of Santa Maria)
- Gabe Gomes
(Carnegie Mellon University
Carnegie Mellon University
Carnegie Mellon University
Carnegie Mellon University)
- Alison R. H. Narayan
(University of Michigan
University of Michigan)
Abstract
The application of biocatalysis in synthesis has the potential to offer streamlined routes towards target molecules1, tunable catalyst-controlled selectivity2, as well as processes with improved sustainability3. Despite these advantages, biocatalysis is often a high-risk strategy to implement, as identifying an enzyme capable of performing chemistry on a specific intermediate required for a synthesis can be a roadblock that requires extensive screening of enzymes and protein engineering to overcome4. Strategies for predicting which enzyme and small molecule are compatible have been hindered by the lack of well-studied biocatalytic reaction datasets5. The underexploration of connections between chemical and protein sequence space constrains navigation between these two landscapes. Here we report a two-phase effort relying on high-throughput experimentation to populate connections between productive substrate and enzyme pairs and the subsequent development of a tool, CATNIP, for predicting compatible α-ketoglutarate (α-KG)/Fe(ii)-dependent enzymes for a given substrate or, conversely, for ranking potential substrates for a given α-KG/Fe(ii)-dependent enzyme sequence. We anticipate that our approach can be readily expanded to further enzyme and transformation classes and will derisk the investigation and application of biocatalytic methods.
Suggested Citation
Alexandra E. Paton & Daniil A. Boiko & Jonathan C. Perkins & Nicholas I. Cemalovic & Thiago Reschützegger & Gabe Gomes & Alison R. H. Narayan, 2025.
"Connecting chemical and protein sequence space to predict biocatalytic reactions,"
Nature, Nature, vol. 646(8083), pages 108-116, October.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:nature:v:646:y:2025:i:8083:d:10.1038_s41586-025-09519-5
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-025-09519-5
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:646:y:2025:i:8083:d:10.1038_s41586-025-09519-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.