IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v645y2025i8080d10.1038_s41586-025-09241-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The neural basis of species-specific defensive behaviour in Peromyscus mice

Author

Listed:
  • Felix Baier

    (Harvard University
    Harvard University
    Harvard University
    Harvard University)

  • Katja Reinhard

    (Neuro-Electronics Research Flanders
    KU Leuven
    Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati)

  • Bram Nuttin

    (Neuro-Electronics Research Flanders
    KU Leuven)

  • Arnau Sans-Dublanc

    (Neuro-Electronics Research Flanders
    KU Leuven)

  • Chen Liu

    (Neuro-Electronics Research Flanders
    KU Leuven)

  • Victoria Tong

    (Harvard University
    Vanderbilt University School of Medicine)

  • Julie S. Murmann

    (Neuro-Electronics Research Flanders
    Institute of Science and Technology Austria)

  • Keimpe Wierda

    (VIB-KU Leuven Center for Brain and Disease Research, CBD Technologies)

  • Karl Farrow

    (Neuro-Electronics Research Flanders
    KU Leuven
    VIB
    imec)

  • Hopi E. Hoekstra

    (Harvard University
    Harvard University
    Harvard University
    Harvard University)

Abstract

Evading imminent threat from predators is critical for animal survival. Effective defensive strategies can vary, even between closely related species. However, the neural basis of such species-specific behaviours remains poorly understood1–4. Here we find that two sister species of deer mice (genus Peromyscus)5 show different responses to the same looming stimulus: Peromyscus maniculatus, which occupies densely vegetated habitats, predominantly escapes, whereas the open field specialist, Peromyscus polionotus, briefly freezes. This difference arises from species-specific escape thresholds, is largely context-independent, and can be triggered by both visual and auditory threat stimuli. Using immunohistochemistry and electrophysiological recordings, we find that although visual threat activates the superior colliculus in both species, the role of the dorsal periaqueductal grey (dPAG) in driving behaviour differs. Whereas dPAG activity scales with running speed in P. maniculatus, neural activity in the dPAG of P. polionotus correlates poorly with movement, including during visually triggered escape. Moreover, optogenetic activation of dPAG neurons elicits acceleration in P. maniculatus but not in P. polionotus, and their chemogenetic inhibition during a looming stimulus delays escape onset in P. maniculatus to match that of P. polionotus. Together, we trace species-specific escape thresholds to a central circuit node, downstream of peripheral sensory neurons, localizing an ecologically relevant behavioural difference to a specific region of the mammalian brain.

Suggested Citation

  • Felix Baier & Katja Reinhard & Bram Nuttin & Arnau Sans-Dublanc & Chen Liu & Victoria Tong & Julie S. Murmann & Keimpe Wierda & Karl Farrow & Hopi E. Hoekstra, 2025. "The neural basis of species-specific defensive behaviour in Peromyscus mice," Nature, Nature, vol. 645(8080), pages 439-447, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:645:y:2025:i:8080:d:10.1038_s41586-025-09241-2
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-025-09241-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-09241-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-025-09241-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:645:y:2025:i:8080:d:10.1038_s41586-025-09241-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.