IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v644y2025i8076d10.1038_s41586-025-09203-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

PPP2R1A mutations portend improved survival after cancer immunotherapy

Author

Listed:
  • Yibo Dai

    (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
    The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Houston Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences)

  • Anne Knisely

    (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center)

  • Mitsutake Yano

    (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center)

  • Minghao Dang

    (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center)

  • Emily M. Hinchcliff

    (Robert H Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center)

  • Sanghoon Lee

    (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center)

  • Annalyn Welp

    (University of Virginia School of Medicine)

  • Manoj Chelvanambi

    (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center)

  • Matthew Lastrapes

    (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center)

  • Heng Liu

    (The Wistar Institute)

  • Zhe Yuan

    (The Wistar Institute)

  • Chen Wang

    (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center)

  • Hao Nie

    (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center)

  • Stephanie Jean

    (Helen F. Graham Cancer Center & Research Institute)

  • Luis J. Montaner

    (The Wistar Institute)

  • Jiakai Hou

    (University of Houston)

  • Ami Patel

    (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center)

  • Shrina Patel

    (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center)

  • Bryan Fellman

    (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center)

  • Ying Yuan

    (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center)

  • Baohua Sun

    (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center)

  • Renganayaki Krishna Pandurengan

    (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center)

  • Edwin Roger Parra Cuentas

    (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center)

  • Joseph Celestino

    (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center)

  • Yan Liu

    (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center)

  • Jinsong Liu

    (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center)

  • R. Tyler Hillman

    (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center)

  • Shannon N. Westin

    (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center)

  • Anil K. Sood

    (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center)

  • Pamela T. Soliman

    (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center)

  • Aaron Shafer

    (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center)

  • Larissa A. Meyer

    (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center)

  • David M. Gershenson

    (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center)

  • David Vining

    (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center)

  • Dhakshinamoorthy Ganeshan

    (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center)

  • Karen Lu

    (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center)

  • Jennifer A. Wargo

    (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
    The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Houston Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences
    The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center)

  • Weiyi Peng

    (University of Houston)

  • Rugang Zhang

    (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Houston Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences
    The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center)

  • Linghua Wang

    (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
    The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Houston Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences
    The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
    The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center)

  • Amir A. Jazaeri

    (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Houston Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences
    The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center)

Abstract

Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy is effective against many cancers, although resistance remains a major issue and new strategies are needed to improve clinical outcomes1–5. Here we studied ICB response in a cohort of patients with ovarian clear cell carcinoma—a cancer type that poses considerable clinical challenges and lacks effective therapies6–8. We observed significantly prolonged overall survival and progression-free survival in patients with tumours with PPP2R1A mutations. Importantly, our findings were validated in additional ICB-treated patient cohorts across multiple cancer types. Translational analyses from tumour biopsies demonstrated enhanced IFNγ signalling, and the presence of tertiary lymphoid structures at the baseline, as well as enhanced immune infiltration and expansion of CD45RO+CD8+ T cells in the tumour neighbourhood after ICB treatment in PPP2R1A-mutated tumours. Parallel preclinical investigations showed that targeting PPP2R1A (by pharmacological inhibition or genetic modifications) in in vitro and in vivo models was associated with improved survival in the setting of treatment with several forms of immunotherapy, including chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy and ICB. The results from these studies suggest that therapeutic targeting of PPP2R1A may represent an effective strategy to improve patient outcomes after ICB or other forms of immunotherapy, although additional mechanistic and therapeutic insights are needed.

Suggested Citation

  • Yibo Dai & Anne Knisely & Mitsutake Yano & Minghao Dang & Emily M. Hinchcliff & Sanghoon Lee & Annalyn Welp & Manoj Chelvanambi & Matthew Lastrapes & Heng Liu & Zhe Yuan & Chen Wang & Hao Nie & Stepha, 2025. "PPP2R1A mutations portend improved survival after cancer immunotherapy," Nature, Nature, vol. 644(8076), pages 537-546, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:644:y:2025:i:8076:d:10.1038_s41586-025-09203-8
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-025-09203-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-09203-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-025-09203-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:644:y:2025:i:8076:d:10.1038_s41586-025-09203-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.