IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v643y2025i8074d10.1038_s41586-025-09210-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mechanism of cytarabine-induced neurotoxicity

Author

Listed:
  • Jia-Cheng Liu

    (NIH)

  • Dongpeng Wang

    (NIH
    Chinese Academy of Sciences)

  • Elsa Callen

    (NIH)

  • Chuanyuan Chen

    (NIH)

  • Santiago Noriega

    (NIH)

  • Yafang Shang

    (University of Chinese Academy of Sciences)

  • David Schürmann

    (University of Basel)

  • Yawei Song

    (University of Chinese Academy of Sciences)

  • Gokul N. Ramadoss

    (Gladstone Institutes)

  • Raj Chari

    (Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research)

  • Nancy Wong

    (NIH)

  • Yongge Zhao

    (NIH)

  • Yuan He

    (Johns Hopkins University
    Johns Hopkins University)

  • Peter D. Aplan

    (NIH)

  • Michael E. Ward

    (NIH)

  • Nathaniel Heintz

    (The Rockefeller University)

  • Anjana Rao

    (La Jolla Institute for Immunology)

  • Peter J. McKinnon

    (St Jude Children’s Research Hospital)

  • Keith W. Caldecott

    (University of Sussex)

  • Primo Schär

    (University of Basel)

  • Fei-Long Meng

    (University of Chinese Academy of Sciences)

  • Ferenc Livak

    (NIH)

  • Wei Wu

    (University of Chinese Academy of Sciences)

  • André Nussenzweig

    (NIH)

Abstract

Postmitotic neurons have high levels of methylated cytosine and its oxidized intermediates such as 5-hydroxymethylcytosine1. However, the functional relevance of these epigenetic modifications of DNA are poorly understood. Here we show that some cytidine analogues, such as cytarabine, cause DNA double-strand breaks during TET-mediated active 5-methylcytosine demethylation by interrupting TDG-dependent base excision repair. These double-strand breaks are frequently converted into deletions and translocations by DNA ligase 4. In vivo, Purkinje and Golgi cells in the cerebellum are the only neuronal populations that exhibit high levels of DNA damage due to cytarabine. In Purkinje cells, TET targets highly expressed gene bodies marked by enhancer-associated histone modifications. Many of these genes control movement coordination, which explains the long-recognized cerebellar neurotoxicity of cytarabine2. We show that other cytidine analogues, such as gemcitabine, cause only single-strand breaks in neurons, which are repaired by DNA ligase 3 with minimal toxicity. Our findings uncover a mechanistic link between TET-mediated DNA demethylation, base excision repair and gene expression in neurons. The results also provide a rational explanation for the different neurotoxicity profiles of an important class of antineoplastic agents.

Suggested Citation

  • Jia-Cheng Liu & Dongpeng Wang & Elsa Callen & Chuanyuan Chen & Santiago Noriega & Yafang Shang & David Schürmann & Yawei Song & Gokul N. Ramadoss & Raj Chari & Nancy Wong & Yongge Zhao & Yuan He & Pet, 2025. "Mechanism of cytarabine-induced neurotoxicity," Nature, Nature, vol. 643(8074), pages 1400-1409, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:643:y:2025:i:8074:d:10.1038_s41586-025-09210-9
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-025-09210-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-09210-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-025-09210-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:643:y:2025:i:8074:d:10.1038_s41586-025-09210-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.