Author
Listed:
- Ryan S. Paterson
(University of Copenhagen)
- Meaghan Mackie
(University of Copenhagen
University of Copenhagen)
- Alessio Capobianco
(Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München)
- Nicola S. Heckeberg
(Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München)
- Danielle Fraser
(Canadian Museum of Nature
Carleton University
Carleton University
Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History)
- Beatrice Demarchi
(University of Turin)
- Fazeelah Munir
(University of York)
- Ioannis Patramanis
(University of Copenhagen)
- Jazmín Ramos-Madrigal
(University of Copenhagen)
- Shanlin Liu
(Chinese Academy of Sciences)
- Abigail D. Ramsøe
(University of Copenhagen)
- Marc R. Dickinson
(University of York)
- Chloë Baldreki
(University of York)
- Marisa Gilbert
(Canadian Museum of Nature)
- Raffaele Sardella
(Sapienza University of Rome)
- Luca Bellucci
(Università di Firenze)
- Gabriele Scorrano
(University of Copenhagen
University of Rome “Tor Vegata”)
- Michela Leonardi
(University of Cambridge
University of Cambridge)
- Andrea Manica
(University of Cambridge)
- Fernando Racimo
(University of Copenhagen)
- Eske Willerslev
(University of Copenhagen
University of Cambridge
University of Bremen)
- Kirsty E. H. Penkman
(University of York)
- Jesper V. Olsen
(University of Copenhagen)
- Ross D. E. MacPhee
(American Museum of Natural History)
- Natalia Rybczynski
(Canadian Museum of Nature)
- Sebastian Höhna
(Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München)
- Enrico Cappellini
(University of Copenhagen)
Abstract
In the past decade, ancient protein sequences have emerged as a valuable source of data for deep-time phylogenetic inference1–4. Still, even though ancient proteins have been reported from the Middle–Late Miocene5,6, the recovery of protein sequences providing subordinal-level phylogenetic insights does not exceed 3.7 million years ago (Pliocene)1. Here, we push this boundary back to 21–24 million years ago (Early Miocene) by retrieving enamel protein sequences of a rhinocerotid (Epiaceratherium sp.; CMNFV59632) from Canada’s High Arctic. We recover partial sequences of seven enamel proteins and more than 1,000 peptide–spectrum matches, spanning at least 251 amino acids. Endogeneity is in line with thermal age estimates and is supported by indicators of protein damage, including several spontaneous and irreversible chemical modifications accumulated during prolonged diagenesis. Bayesian tip-dating places the divergence time of CMNFV59632 in the Middle Eocene–Oligocene, coinciding with a phase of high rhinocerotid diversification7. This analysis identifies a later Oligocene divergence for Elasmotheriinae, weakening alternative models suggesting a deep basal split between Elasmotheriinae and Rhinocerotinae8,9. The findings are consistent with hypotheses on the origin of the enigmatic fauna of the Haughton Crater, which, in spite of considerable endemism, has similarity to distant Eurasian faunas10,11. Our findings demonstrate the potential of palaeoproteomics in obtaining phylogenetic information from a specimen that is approximately ten times older than any sample from which endogenous DNA has been obtained so far.
Suggested Citation
Ryan S. Paterson & Meaghan Mackie & Alessio Capobianco & Nicola S. Heckeberg & Danielle Fraser & Beatrice Demarchi & Fazeelah Munir & Ioannis Patramanis & Jazmín Ramos-Madrigal & Shanlin Liu & Abigail, 2025.
"Phylogenetically informative proteins from an Early Miocene rhinocerotid,"
Nature, Nature, vol. 643(8072), pages 719-724, July.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:nature:v:643:y:2025:i:8072:d:10.1038_s41586-025-09231-4
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-025-09231-4
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:643:y:2025:i:8072:d:10.1038_s41586-025-09231-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.