IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v643y2025i8072d10.1038_s41586-025-09201-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Global terrestrial nitrogen fixation and its modification by agriculture

Author

Listed:
  • Carla R. Reis Ely

    (Oregon State University
    Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education)

  • Steven S. Perakis

    (United States Geological Survey)

  • Cory C. Cleveland

    (University of Montana)

  • Duncan N. L. Menge

    (Columbia University)

  • Sasha C. Reed

    (United States Geological Survey)

  • Benton N. Taylor

    (Harvard University)

  • Sarah A. Batterman

    (Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies
    University of Leeds
    Smithsonian Institution)

  • Christopher M. Clark

    (US Environmental Protection Agency)

  • Timothy E. Crews

    (The Land Institute)

  • Katherine A. Dynarski

    (University of Montana)

  • Maga Gei

    (Association for Tropical Biology and Conservation)

  • Michael J. Gundale

    (Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences)

  • David F. Herridge

    (University of New England)

  • Sarah E. Jovan

    (USDA Forest Service)

  • Sian Kou-Giesbrecht

    (Dalhousie University)

  • Mark B. Peoples

    (CSIRO)

  • Johannes Piipponen

    (Aalto University)

  • Emilio Rodríguez-Caballero

    (Universidad de Almería
    Max Planck Institute for Chemistry)

  • Verity G. Salmon

    (Oak Ridge National Laboratory)

  • Fiona M. Soper

    (McGill University)

  • Anika P. Staccone

    (Earthshot Labs)

  • Bettina Weber

    (Max Planck Institute for Chemistry
    University of Graz)

  • Christopher A. Williams

    (Clark University)

  • Nina Wurzburger

    (University of Georgia)

Abstract

Biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) is the largest natural source of new nitrogen (N) that supports terrestrial productivity1,2, yet estimates of global terrestrial BNF remain highly uncertain3,4. Here we show that this uncertainty is partly because of sampling bias, as field BNF measurements in natural terrestrial ecosystems occur where N fixers are 17 times more prevalent than their mean abundances worldwide. To correct this bias, we develop new estimates of global terrestrial BNF by upscaling field BNF measurements using spatially explicit abundances of all major biogeochemical N-fixing niches. We find that natural biomes sustain lower BNF, 65 (52–77) Tg N yr−1, than previous empirical bottom-up estimates3,4, with most BNF occurring in tropical forests and drylands. We also find high agricultural BNF in croplands and cultivated pastures, 56 (54–58) Tg N yr−1. Agricultural BNF has increased terrestrial BNF by 64% and total terrestrial N inputs from all sources by 60% over pre-industrial levels. Our results indicate that BNF may impose stronger constraints on the carbon sink in natural terrestrial biomes and represent a larger source of agricultural N than is generally considered in analyses of the global N cycle5,6, with implications for proposed safe operating limits for N use7,8.

Suggested Citation

  • Carla R. Reis Ely & Steven S. Perakis & Cory C. Cleveland & Duncan N. L. Menge & Sasha C. Reed & Benton N. Taylor & Sarah A. Batterman & Christopher M. Clark & Timothy E. Crews & Katherine A. Dynarski, 2025. "Global terrestrial nitrogen fixation and its modification by agriculture," Nature, Nature, vol. 643(8072), pages 705-711, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:643:y:2025:i:8072:d:10.1038_s41586-025-09201-w
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-025-09201-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-09201-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-025-09201-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:643:y:2025:i:8072:d:10.1038_s41586-025-09201-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.