Author
Listed:
- Shuhui Cai
(Chinese Academy of Sciences
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences)
- Kaixian Qi
(Chinese Academy of Sciences
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences)
- Saihong Yang
(Chinese Academy of Sciences)
- Jie Fang
(Chinese Academy of Sciences
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences)
- Pingyuan Shi
(Chinese Academy of Sciences
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences)
- Zhongshan Shen
(Chinese Academy of Sciences)
- Min Zhang
(Chinese Academy of Sciences)
- Huafeng Qin
(Chinese Academy of Sciences
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences)
- Chi Zhang
(Chinese Academy of Sciences)
- Xiaoguang Li
(Chinese Academy of Sciences)
- Fangfang Chen
(Chinese Academy of Sciences
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences)
- Yi Chen
(Chinese Academy of Sciences
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences)
- Jinhua Li
(University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
Chinese Academy of Sciences)
- Huaiyu He
(Chinese Academy of Sciences
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences)
- Chenglong Deng
(Chinese Academy of Sciences
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences)
- Chunlai Li
(Chinese Academy of Sciences)
- Yongxin Pan
(University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
Chinese Academy of Sciences)
- Rixiang Zhu
(Chinese Academy of Sciences)
Abstract
The evolution of the lunar dynamo is essential for deciphering the deep interior structure, thermal history and surface environment of the Moon1–4. Previous palaeomagnetic investigations on samples returned from the nearside of the Moon have established the general variation of the lunar magnetic field5–7. However, limited spatial and temporal palaeomagnetic constraints leave the evolution of the lunar dynamo ambiguous. The Chang’e-6 mission returned the first farside basalts dated at about 2.8 billion years ago (Ga) (refs. 8,9), offering an opportunity to investigate a critical spatiotemporal gap in the evolution of the global lunar dynamo. Here we report palaeointensities (around 5–21 μT) recovered from the Chang’e-6 basalts, providing the first constraint on the magnetic field from the lunar farside and a critical anchor within the large gap between 3 Ga and 2 Ga. These results record a rebound of the field strength after its previous sharp decline of around 3.1 Ga, which attests to an active lunar dynamo at about 2.8 Ga in the mid-early stage and argues against the suggestion that the lunar dynamo may have remained in a low-energy state after 3 Ga until its demise. The results indicate that the lunar dynamo was probably driven by either a basal magma ocean or a precession, supplemented by other mechanisms such as core crystallization.
Suggested Citation
Shuhui Cai & Kaixian Qi & Saihong Yang & Jie Fang & Pingyuan Shi & Zhongshan Shen & Min Zhang & Huafeng Qin & Chi Zhang & Xiaoguang Li & Fangfang Chen & Yi Chen & Jinhua Li & Huaiyu He & Chenglong Den, 2025.
"A reinforced lunar dynamo recorded by Chang’e-6 farside basalt,"
Nature, Nature, vol. 643(8071), pages 361-365, July.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:nature:v:643:y:2025:i:8071:d:10.1038_s41586-024-08526-2
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-024-08526-2
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:643:y:2025:i:8071:d:10.1038_s41586-024-08526-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.