IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v643y2025i8070d10.1038_s41586-025-09024-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of phosphorylation barcodes on arrestin binding to a chemokine receptor

Author

Listed:
  • Qiuyan Chen

    (Indiana University School of Medicine
    Purdue University)

  • Christopher T. Schafer

    (San Diego
    Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)

  • Somnath Mukherjee

    (University of Chicago)

  • Kai Wang

    (San Diego)

  • Martin Gustavsson

    (San Diego
    University of Copenhagen)

  • James R. Fuller

    (LLC)

  • Katelyn Tepper

    (Indiana University School of Medicine)

  • Thomas D. Lamme

    (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)

  • Yasmin Aydin

    (Indiana University School of Medicine)

  • Parth Agrawal

    (University of Chicago)

  • Genki Terashi

    (Purdue University)

  • Xin-Qiu Yao

    (University of Nebraska Omaha)

  • Daisuke Kihara

    (Purdue University)

  • Anthony A. Kossiakoff

    (University of Chicago)

  • Tracy M. Handel

    (San Diego)

  • John J. G. Tesmer

    (Purdue University)

Abstract

Unique phosphorylation ‘barcodes’ installed in different regions of an active seven-transmembrane receptor by different G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) kinases (GRKs) have been proposed to promote distinct cellular outcomes1, but it is unclear whether or how arrestins differentially engage these barcodes. Here, to address this, we developed an antigen-binding fragment (Fab7) that recognizes both active arrestin2 (β-arrestin1) and arrestin3 (β-arrestin2) without interacting with bound receptor polypeptides. We used Fab7 to determine the structures of both arrestins in complex with atypical chemokine receptor 3 (ACKR3) phosphorylated in different regions of its C-terminal tail by either GRK2 or GRK5 (ref. 2). The GRK2-phosphorylated ACKR3 resulted in more heterogeneous ‘tail-mode’ assemblies, whereas phosphorylation by GRK5 resulted in more rigid ‘ACKR3-adjacent’ assemblies. Unexpectedly, the finger loops of both arrestins engaged the micelle surface rather than the receptor intracellular pocket, with arrestin3 being more dynamic, partly because of its lack of a membrane-anchoring motif. Thus, both the region of the barcode and the arrestin isoform involved can alter the structure and dynamics of GPCR–arrestin complexes, providing a possible mechanistic basis for unique downstream cellular effects, such as the efficiency of chemokine scavenging and the robustness of arrestin binding in ACKR3.

Suggested Citation

  • Qiuyan Chen & Christopher T. Schafer & Somnath Mukherjee & Kai Wang & Martin Gustavsson & James R. Fuller & Katelyn Tepper & Thomas D. Lamme & Yasmin Aydin & Parth Agrawal & Genki Terashi & Xin-Qiu Ya, 2025. "Effect of phosphorylation barcodes on arrestin binding to a chemokine receptor," Nature, Nature, vol. 643(8070), pages 280-287, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:643:y:2025:i:8070:d:10.1038_s41586-025-09024-9
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-025-09024-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-09024-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-025-09024-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:643:y:2025:i:8070:d:10.1038_s41586-025-09024-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.