IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v642y2025i8069d10.1038_s41586-025-09048-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The pivot penalty in research

Author

Listed:
  • Ryan Hill

    (Northwestern University
    Northwestern University)

  • Yian Yin

    (Northwestern University
    Northwestern University
    Northwestern University
    Cornell University)

  • Carolyn Stein

    (University of California, Berkeley
    University of California, Berkeley)

  • Xizhao Wang

    (Northwestern University)

  • Dashun Wang

    (Northwestern University
    Northwestern University
    Northwestern University
    Northwestern University)

  • Benjamin F. Jones

    (Northwestern University
    Northwestern University
    Northwestern University
    National Bureau of Economic Research)

Abstract

Scientists and inventors set the direction of their work amid evolving questions, opportunities and challenges, yet the understanding of pivots between research areas and their outcomes remains limited1–5. Theories of creative search highlight the potential benefits of exploration but also emphasize difficulties in moving beyond one’s expertise6–14. Here we introduce a measurement framework to quantify how far researchers move from their existing work, and apply it to millions of papers and patents. We find a pervasive ‘pivot penalty’, in which the impact of new research steeply declines the further a researcher moves from their previous work. The pivot penalty applies nearly universally across science and patenting, and has been growing in magnitude over the past five decades. Larger pivots further exhibit weak engagement with established mixtures of prior knowledge, lower publication success rates and less market impact. Unexpected shocks to the research landscape, which may push researchers away from existing areas or pull them into new ones, further demonstrate substantial pivot penalties, including in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. The pivot penalty generalizes across fields, career stage, productivity, collaboration and funding contexts, highlighting both the breadth and depth of the adaptive challenge. Overall, the findings point to large and increasing challenges in effectively adapting to new opportunities and threats, with implications for individual researchers, research organizations, science policy and the capacity of science and society as a whole to confront emergent demands.

Suggested Citation

  • Ryan Hill & Yian Yin & Carolyn Stein & Xizhao Wang & Dashun Wang & Benjamin F. Jones, 2025. "The pivot penalty in research," Nature, Nature, vol. 642(8069), pages 999-1006, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:642:y:2025:i:8069:d:10.1038_s41586-025-09048-1
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-025-09048-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-09048-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-025-09048-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Keloharju, Matti & Keluharju, Roope, 2025. "Accounting Research in the Age of AI," Working Paper Series 1528, Research Institute of Industrial Economics, revised 29 Jul 2025.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:642:y:2025:i:8069:d:10.1038_s41586-025-09048-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.