IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v642y2025i8066d10.1038_s41586-025-08921-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Long-term impact and biological recovery in a deep-sea mining track

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel O. B. Jones

    (European Way)

  • Maria Belen Arias

    (South Kensington)

  • Loïc Van Audenhaege

    (European Way)

  • Sabena Blackbird

    (University of Liverpool)

  • Corie Boolukos

    (South Kensington)

  • Guadalupe Bribiesca-Contreras

    (European Way
    South Kensington)

  • Jonathan T. Copley

    (European Way)

  • Andrew Dale

    (Scottish Association for Marine Science)

  • Susan Evans

    (European Way)

  • Bethany F. M. Fleming

    (European Way
    European Way)

  • Andrew R. Gates

    (European Way)

  • Hannah Grant

    (Research Avenue South)

  • Mark G. J. Hartl

    (Riccarton)

  • Veerle A. I. Huvenne

    (European Way)

  • Rachel M. Jeffreys

    (University of Liverpool)

  • Pierre Josso

    (Research Avenue South)

  • Lucas D. King

    (South Kensington)

  • Erik Simon-Lledó

    (European Way
    Institut de Ciències del Mar (ICM-CSIC))

  • Tim Le Bas

    (European Way)

  • Louisa Norman

    (University of Liverpool)

  • Bryan O’Malley

    (Eckerd College)

  • Thomas Peacock

    (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)

  • Tracy Shimmield

    (Research Avenue South
    Riccarton)

  • Eva C. D. Stewart

    (South Kensington
    European Way)

  • Andrew K. Sweetman

    (Scottish Association for Marine Science)

  • Catherine Wardell

    (European Way
    European Way)

  • Dmitry Aleynik

    (Scottish Association for Marine Science)

  • Adrian G. Glover

    (South Kensington)

Abstract

Deep-sea polymetallic nodule mining is in the exploration phase at present with some groups proposing a move towards extraction within years1. Management of this industry requires evidence of the long-term effects on deep-sea ecosystems2, but the ability of seafloor ecosystems to recover from impacts over decadal scales is poorly understood3. Here we show that, four decades after a test mining experiment that removed nodules, the biological impacts in many groups of organisms are persistent, although populations of several organisms, including sediment macrofauna, mobile deposit feeders and even large-sized sessile fauna, have begun to re-establish despite persistent physical changes at the seafloor. We also reveal that areas affected by plumes from this small-scale test have limited detectable residual sedimentation impacts with some biological assemblages similar in abundance compared to control areas after 44 years. Although some aspects of the modern collector design may cause reduced physical impact compared to this test mining experiment, our results show that mining impacts in the abyssal ocean will be persistent over at least decadal timeframes and communities will remain altered in directly disturbed areas, despite some recolonization. The long-term effects seen in our study provide critical data for effective management of mining activities, if they occur, including minimizing direct impacts and setting aside an effective network of protected areas4,5.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel O. B. Jones & Maria Belen Arias & Loïc Van Audenhaege & Sabena Blackbird & Corie Boolukos & Guadalupe Bribiesca-Contreras & Jonathan T. Copley & Andrew Dale & Susan Evans & Bethany F. M. Flemin, 2025. "Long-term impact and biological recovery in a deep-sea mining track," Nature, Nature, vol. 642(8066), pages 112-118, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:642:y:2025:i:8066:d:10.1038_s41586-025-08921-3
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-025-08921-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-08921-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-025-08921-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:642:y:2025:i:8066:d:10.1038_s41586-025-08921-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.