IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v641y2025i8064d10.1038_s41586-025-08928-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring pathways for world development within planetary boundaries

Author

Listed:
  • Detlef P. van Vuuren

    (Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (PBL)
    Utrecht University)

  • Jonathan C. Doelman

    (Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (PBL)
    Utrecht University)

  • Isabela Schmidt Tagomori

    (Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (PBL))

  • Arthur H. W. Beusen

    (Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (PBL)
    Utrecht University)

  • Sarah E. Cornell

    (Stockholm Resilience Centre)

  • Johan Röckstrom

    (Stockholm Resilience Centre
    Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research
    University of Potsdam)

  • Aafke M. Schipper

    (Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (PBL)
    Radboud University)

  • Elke Stehfest

    (Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (PBL))

  • Geanderson Ambrosio

    (Utrecht University)

  • Maarten Berg

    (Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (PBL))

  • Lex Bouwman

    (Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (PBL)
    Utrecht University)

  • Vassilis Daioglou

    (Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (PBL)
    Utrecht University)

  • Mathijs Harmsen

    (Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (PBL))

  • Paul Lucas

    (Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (PBL))

  • Kaj-Ivar Wijst

    (Utrecht University)

  • Willem-Jan Zeist

    (Wageningen Economic Research)

Abstract

The pressures humanity has been placing on the environment have put Earth’s stability at risk. The planetary boundaries framework serves as a method to define a ‘safe operating space for humanity’1,2 and has so far been applied mostly to highlight the currently prevailing unsustainable environmental conditions. The ability to evaluate trends over time, however, can help us explore the consequences of alternative policy decisions and identify pathways for living within planetary boundaries3. Here we use the Integrated Model to Assess the Global Environment4 to project control variables for eight out of nine planetary boundaries under alternative scenarios to 2050, both with and without strong environmental policy measures. The results show that, with current trends and policies, the situation is projected to worsen to 2050 for all planetary boundaries, except for ozone depletion. Targeted interventions, such as implementing the Paris climate agreement, a shift to a healthier diet, improved food, and water- and nutrient-use efficiency, can effectively reduce the degree of transgression of the planetary boundaries, steering humanity towards a more sustainable trajectory (that is, if they can be implemented based on social and institutional feasibility considerations). However, even in this scenario, several planetary boundaries, including climate change, biogeochemical flows and biodiversity, will remain transgressed in 2050, partly as result of inertia. This means that more-effective policy measures will be needed to ensure we are living well within the planetary boundaries.

Suggested Citation

  • Detlef P. van Vuuren & Jonathan C. Doelman & Isabela Schmidt Tagomori & Arthur H. W. Beusen & Sarah E. Cornell & Johan Röckstrom & Aafke M. Schipper & Elke Stehfest & Geanderson Ambrosio & Maarten Ber, 2025. "Exploring pathways for world development within planetary boundaries," Nature, Nature, vol. 641(8064), pages 910-916, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:641:y:2025:i:8064:d:10.1038_s41586-025-08928-w
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-025-08928-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-08928-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-025-08928-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:641:y:2025:i:8064:d:10.1038_s41586-025-08928-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.