IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v641y2025i8062d10.1038_s41586-025-08687-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Transient silencing of hypermutation preserves B cell affinity during clonal bursting

Author

Listed:
  • Juhee Pae

    (The Rockefeller University)

  • Niklas Schwan

    (Helmholtz Center for Infection Research)

  • Bertrand Ottino-Loffler

    (The Rockefeller University)

  • William S. DeWitt

    (University of Washington)

  • Amar Garg

    (Helmholtz Center for Infection Research)

  • Juliana Bortolatto

    (The Rockefeller University
    Howard Hughes Medical Institute)

  • Ashni A. Vora

    (The Rockefeller University)

  • Jin-Jie Shen

    (The Rockefeller University)

  • Alvaro Hobbs

    (The Rockefeller University)

  • Tiago B. R. Castro

    (The Rockefeller University)

  • Luka Mesin

    (The Rockefeller University)

  • Frederick A. Matsen

    (University of Washington
    Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
    Howard Hughes Medical Institute
    University of Washington)

  • Michael Meyer-Hermann

    (Helmholtz Center for Infection Research
    Lower Saxony Center for Artificial Intelligence and Causal Methods in Medicine (CAIMed))

  • Gabriel D. Victora

    (The Rockefeller University
    Howard Hughes Medical Institute)

Abstract

In the course of antibody affinity maturation, germinal centre (GC) B cells mutate their immunoglobulin heavy- and light-chain genes in a process known as somatic hypermutation (SHM)1–4. Panels of mutant B cells with different binding affinities for antigens are then selected in a Darwinian manner, which leads to a progressive increase in affinity among the population5. As with any Darwinian process, rare gain-of-fitness mutations must be identified and common loss-of-fitness mutations avoided6. Progressive acquisition of mutations therefore poses a risk during large proliferative bursts7, when GC B cells undergo several cell cycles in the absence of affinity-based selection8–13. Using a combination of in vivo mouse experiments and mathematical modelling, here we show that GCs achieve this balance by strongly suppressing SHM during clonal-burst-type expansion, so that a large fraction of the progeny generated by these bursts does not deviate from their ancestral genotype. Intravital imaging and image-based cell sorting of a mouse strain carrying a reporter of cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (CDK2) activity showed that B cells that are actively undergoing proliferative bursts lack the transient CDK2low ‘G0-like’ phase of the cell cycle in which SHM takes place. We propose a model in which inertially cycling B cells mostly delay SHM until the G0-like phase that follows their final round of division in the GC dark zone, thus maintaining affinity as they clonally expand in the absence of selection.

Suggested Citation

  • Juhee Pae & Niklas Schwan & Bertrand Ottino-Loffler & William S. DeWitt & Amar Garg & Juliana Bortolatto & Ashni A. Vora & Jin-Jie Shen & Alvaro Hobbs & Tiago B. R. Castro & Luka Mesin & Frederick A. , 2025. "Transient silencing of hypermutation preserves B cell affinity during clonal bursting," Nature, Nature, vol. 641(8062), pages 486-494, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:641:y:2025:i:8062:d:10.1038_s41586-025-08687-8
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-025-08687-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-08687-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-025-08687-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:641:y:2025:i:8062:d:10.1038_s41586-025-08687-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.