IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v640y2025i8057d10.1038_s41586-025-08618-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A cryptic pocket in CB1 drives peripheral and functional selectivity

Author

Listed:
  • Vipin Ashok Rangari

    (University of Health Sciences and Pharmacy and Washington University School of Medicine
    Washington University School of Medicine)

  • Evan S. O’Brien

    (Stanford University School of Medicine
    Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine)

  • Alexander S. Powers

    (Stanford University School of Medicine
    Stanford University
    Stanford University School of Medicine
    Stanford University)

  • Richard A. Slivicki

    (Washington University School of Medicine)

  • Zachariah Bertels

    (Washington University School of Medicine)

  • Kevin Appourchaux

    (University of Health Sciences and Pharmacy and Washington University School of Medicine
    Washington University School of Medicine)

  • Deniz Aydin

    (Stanford University School of Medicine
    Stanford University
    Stanford University School of Medicine
    Stanford University)

  • Nokomis Ramos-Gonzalez

    (University of Health Sciences and Pharmacy and Washington University School of Medicine
    Washington University School of Medicine)

  • Juliet Mwirigi

    (Washington University School of Medicine)

  • Li Lin

    (UF Scripps Biomedical Research)

  • Elizaveta Mangutov

    (University of Health Sciences and Pharmacy and Washington University School of Medicine
    Washington University School of Medicine)

  • Briana L. Sobecks

    (Stanford University School of Medicine
    Stanford University
    Stanford University School of Medicine
    Stanford University)

  • Yaseen Awad-Agbaria

    (University of Health Sciences and Pharmacy and Washington University School of Medicine
    Washington University School of Medicine)

  • Manoj B. Uphade

    (University of Health Sciences and Pharmacy and Washington University School of Medicine
    Washington University School of Medicine)

  • Jhoan Aguilar

    (University of Health Sciences and Pharmacy and Washington University School of Medicine
    Washington University School of Medicine)

  • Teja Nikhil Peddada

    (Stanford University School of Medicine)

  • Yuki Shiimura

    (Stanford University School of Medicine
    Kurume University)

  • Xi-Ping Huang

    (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)

  • Jakayla Folarin-Hines

    (Washington University School of Medicine)

  • Maria Payne

    (Washington University School of Medicine)

  • Anirudh Kalathil

    (University of Health Sciences and Pharmacy and Washington University School of Medicine)

  • Balazs R. Varga

    (University of Health Sciences and Pharmacy and Washington University School of Medicine
    Washington University School of Medicine)

  • Brian K. Kobilka

    (Stanford University)

  • Amynah A. Pradhan

    (University of Health Sciences and Pharmacy and Washington University School of Medicine
    Washington University School of Medicine)

  • Michael D. Cameron

    (UF Scripps Biomedical Research)

  • Kaavya Krishna Kumar

    (Stanford University)

  • Ron O. Dror

    (Stanford University School of Medicine
    Stanford University
    Stanford University School of Medicine
    Stanford University)

  • Robert W. Gereau

    (University of Health Sciences and Pharmacy and Washington University School of Medicine
    Washington University School of Medicine)

  • Susruta Majumdar

    (University of Health Sciences and Pharmacy and Washington University School of Medicine
    Washington University School of Medicine)

Abstract

The current opioid overdose epidemic highlights the urgent need to develop safer and more effective treatments for chronic pain1. Cannabinoid receptor type 1 (CB1) is a promising non-opioid target for pain relief, but its clinical use has been limited by centrally mediated psychoactivity and tolerance. We overcame both issues by designing peripherally restricted CB1 agonists that minimize arrestin recruitment. We achieved these goals by computationally designing positively charged derivatives of the potent CB1 agonist MDMB-Fubinaca2. We designed these ligands to occupy a cryptic pocket identified through molecular dynamics simulations—an extended binding pocket that opens rarely and leads to the conserved signalling residue D2.50 (ref. 3). We used structure determination, pharmacological assays and molecular dynamics simulations to verify the binding modes of these ligands and to determine the molecular mechanism by which they achieve this dampening of arrestin recruitment. Our lead ligand, VIP36, is highly peripherally restricted and demonstrates notable efficacy in three mouse pain models, with 100-fold dose separation between analgesic efficacy and centrally mediated side effects. VIP36 exerts analgesic efficacy through peripheral CB1 receptors and shows limited analgesic tolerance. These results show how targeting a cryptic pocket in a G-protein-coupled receptor can lead to enhanced peripheral selectivity, biased signalling, desired in vivo pharmacology and reduced adverse effects. This has substantial implications for chronic pain treatment but could also revolutionize the design of drugs targeting other G-protein-coupled receptors.

Suggested Citation

  • Vipin Ashok Rangari & Evan S. O’Brien & Alexander S. Powers & Richard A. Slivicki & Zachariah Bertels & Kevin Appourchaux & Deniz Aydin & Nokomis Ramos-Gonzalez & Juliet Mwirigi & Li Lin & Elizaveta M, 2025. "A cryptic pocket in CB1 drives peripheral and functional selectivity," Nature, Nature, vol. 640(8057), pages 265-273, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:640:y:2025:i:8057:d:10.1038_s41586-025-08618-7
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-025-08618-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-08618-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-025-08618-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:640:y:2025:i:8057:d:10.1038_s41586-025-08618-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.