IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v639y2025i8056d10.1038_s41586-025-08586-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Clonal driver neoantigen loss under EGFR TKI and immune selection pressures

Author

Listed:
  • Maise Al Bakir

    (The Francis Crick Institute
    University College London Cancer Institute)

  • James L. Reading

    (University College London Cancer Institute
    University College London Cancer Institute)

  • Samuel Gamble

    (University College London Cancer Institute)

  • Rachel Rosenthal

    (The Francis Crick Institute)

  • Imran Uddin

    (University College London)

  • Andrew Rowan

    (The Francis Crick Institute)

  • Joanna Przewrocka

    (The Francis Crick Institute)

  • Amber Rogers

    (University College London Cancer Institute)

  • Yien Ning Sophia Wong

    (University College London Cancer Institute)

  • Amalie K. Bentzen

    (University College London Cancer Institute)

  • Selvaraju Veeriah

    (University College London Cancer Institute)

  • Sophia Ward

    (The Francis Crick Institute
    University College London Cancer Institute
    The Francis Crick Institute)

  • Aaron T. Garnett

    (Invitae Inc.)

  • Paula Kalavakur

    (Invitae Inc.)

  • Carlos Martínez-Ruiz

    (University College London)

  • Clare Puttick

    (The Francis Crick Institute
    University College London Cancer Institute
    University College London)

  • Ariana Huebner

    (The Francis Crick Institute
    University College London Cancer Institute
    University College London)

  • Daniel E. Cook

    (The Francis Crick Institute)

  • David A. Moore

    (The Francis Crick Institute
    University College London Cancer Institute
    University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust)

  • Chris Abbosh

    (University College London Cancer Institute)

  • Crispin T. Hiley

    (The Francis Crick Institute
    University College London Cancer Institute)

  • Cristina Naceur-Lombardelli

    (University College London Cancer Institute)

  • Thomas B. K. Watkins

    (The Francis Crick Institute)

  • Marina Petkovic

    (Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association
    Humboldt University of Berlin
    Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin)

  • Roland F. Schwarz

    (University of Cologne
    Berlin Institute for the Foundations of Learning and Data (BIFOLD))

  • Felipe Gálvez-Cancino

    (University of Oxford)

  • Kevin Litchfield

    (The Francis Crick Institute
    University College London Cancer Institute)

  • Peter Meldgaard

    (Aarhus University Hospital)

  • Boe Sandahl Sorensen

    (Aarhus University Hospital)

  • Line Bille Madsen

    (Aarhus University Hospital)

  • Dirk Jäger

    (Heidelberg University Hospital)

  • Martin D. Forster

    (University College London Cancer Institute
    UCL Cancer Institute)

  • Tobias Arkenau

    (Sarah Cannon Research Institute)

  • Clara Domingo-Vila

    (King’s College London)

  • Timothy I. M. Tree

    (King’s College London)

  • Mohammad Kadivar

    (Technical University of Denmark)

  • Sine Reker Hadrup

    (Technical University of Denmark)

  • Benny Chain

    (University College London
    University College London)

  • Sergio A. Quezada

    (University College London Cancer Institute
    University College London Cancer Institute)

  • Nicholas McGranahan

    (University College London Cancer Institute
    University College London)

  • Charles Swanton

    (The Francis Crick Institute
    University College London Cancer Institute)

Abstract

Neoantigen vaccines are under investigation for various cancers, including epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-driven lung cancers1,2. We tracked the phylogenetic history of an EGFR mutant lung cancer treated with erlotinib, osimertinib, radiotherapy and a personalized neopeptide vaccine (NPV) targeting ten somatic mutations, including EGFR exon 19 deletion (ex19del). The ex19del mutation was clonal, but is likely to have appeared after a whole-genome doubling (WGD) event. Following osimertinib and NPV treatment, loss of the ex19del mutation was identified in a progressing small-cell-transformed liver metastasis. Circulating tumour DNA analyses tracking 467 somatic variants revealed the presence of this EGFR wild-type clone before vaccination and its expansion during osimertinib/NPV therapy. Despite systemic T cell reactivity to the vaccine-targeted ex19del neoantigen, the NPV failed to halt disease progression. The liver metastasis lost vaccine-targeted neoantigens through chromosomal instability and exhibited a hostile microenvironment, characterized by limited immune infiltration, low CXCL9 and elevated M2 macrophage levels. Neoantigens arising post-WGD were more likely to be absent in the progressing liver metastasis than those occurring pre-WGD, suggesting that prioritizing pre-WGD neoantigens may improve vaccine design. Data from the TRACERx 421 cohort3 provide evidence that pre-WGD mutations better represent clonal variants, and owing to their presence at multiple copy numbers, are less likely to be lost in metastatic transition. These data highlight the power of phylogenetic disease tracking and functional T cell profiling to understand mechanisms of immune escape during combination therapies.

Suggested Citation

  • Maise Al Bakir & James L. Reading & Samuel Gamble & Rachel Rosenthal & Imran Uddin & Andrew Rowan & Joanna Przewrocka & Amber Rogers & Yien Ning Sophia Wong & Amalie K. Bentzen & Selvaraju Veeriah & S, 2025. "Clonal driver neoantigen loss under EGFR TKI and immune selection pressures," Nature, Nature, vol. 639(8056), pages 1052-1059, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:639:y:2025:i:8056:d:10.1038_s41586-025-08586-y
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-025-08586-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-08586-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-025-08586-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:639:y:2025:i:8056:d:10.1038_s41586-025-08586-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.