Author
Listed:
- Adam S. Lowet
(Harvard University
Harvard University
Harvard University)
- Qiao Zheng
(Harvard University
Harvard Medical School)
- Melissa Meng
(Harvard University
Harvard University)
- Sara Matias
(Harvard University
Harvard University)
- Jan Drugowitsch
(Harvard University
Harvard Medical School)
- Naoshige Uchida
(Harvard University
Harvard University)
Abstract
Machine learning research has achieved large performance gains on a wide range of tasks by expanding the learning target from mean rewards to entire probability distributions of rewards—an approach known as distributional reinforcement learning (RL)1. The mesolimbic dopamine system is thought to underlie RL in the mammalian brain by updating a representation of mean value in the striatum2, but little is known about whether, where and how neurons in this circuit encode information about higher-order moments of reward distributions3. Here, to fill this gap, we used high-density probes (Neuropixels) to record striatal activity from mice performing a classical conditioning task in which reward mean, reward variance and stimulus identity were independently manipulated. In contrast to traditional RL accounts, we found robust evidence for abstract encoding of variance in the striatum. Chronic ablation of dopamine inputs disorganized these distributional representations in the striatum without interfering with mean value coding. Two-photon calcium imaging and optogenetics revealed that the two major classes of striatal medium spiny neurons—D1 and D2—contributed to this code by preferentially encoding the right and left tails of the reward distribution, respectively. We synthesize these findings into a new model of the striatum and mesolimbic dopamine that harnesses the opponency between D1 and D2 medium spiny neurons4–9 to reap the computational benefits of distributional RL.
Suggested Citation
Adam S. Lowet & Qiao Zheng & Melissa Meng & Sara Matias & Jan Drugowitsch & Naoshige Uchida, 2025.
"An opponent striatal circuit for distributional reinforcement learning,"
Nature, Nature, vol. 639(8055), pages 717-726, March.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:nature:v:639:y:2025:i:8055:d:10.1038_s41586-024-08488-5
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-024-08488-5
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:639:y:2025:i:8055:d:10.1038_s41586-024-08488-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.