IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v638y2025i8050d10.1038_s41586-024-08429-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Transforming US agriculture for carbon removal with enhanced weathering

Author

Listed:
  • David J. Beerling

    (University of Sheffield)

  • Euripides P. Kantzas

    (University of Sheffield)

  • Mark R. Lomas

    (University of Sheffield)

  • Lyla L. Taylor

    (University of Sheffield)

  • Shuang Zhang

    (Texas A&M University)

  • Yoshiki Kanzaki

    (Georgia Institute of Technology)

  • Rafael M. Eufrasio

    (University of Sheffield)

  • Phil Renforth

    (Edinburgh Campus)

  • Jean-Francois Mecure

    (University of Exeter
    University of Cambridge)

  • Hector Pollitt

    (University of Cambridge
    World Bank)

  • Philip B. Holden

    (The Open University)

  • Neil R. Edwards

    (University of Cambridge
    The Open University)

  • Lenny Koh

    (University of Sheffield)

  • Dimitar Z. Epihov

    (University of Sheffield)

  • Adam Wolf

    (Princeton University)

  • James E. Hansen

    (Columbia University)

  • Steven A. Banwart

    (University of Leeds)

  • Nick F. Pidgeon

    (Cardiff University)

  • Christopher T. Reinhard

    (Georgia Institute of Technology)

  • Noah J. Planavsky

    (Yale University)

  • Maria Val Martin

    (University of Sheffield)

Abstract

Enhanced weathering (EW) with agriculture uses crushed silicate rocks to drive carbon dioxide removal (CDR)1,2. If widely adopted on farmlands, it could help achieve net-zero emissions by 20502–4. Here we show, with a detailed US state-specific carbon cycle analysis constrained by resource provision, that EW deployed on agricultural land could sequester 0.16–0.30 GtCO2 yr−1 by 2050, rising to 0.25–0.49 GtCO2 yr−1 by 2070. Geochemical assessment of rivers and oceans suggests effective transport of dissolved products from EW from soils, offering CDR on intergenerational timescales. Our analysis further indicates that EW may temporarily help lower ground-level ozone and concentrations of secondary aerosols in agricultural regions. Geospatially mapped CDR costs show heterogeneity across the USA, reflecting a combination of cropland distance from basalt source regions, timing of EW deployment and evolving CDR rates. CDR costs are highest in the first two decades before declining to about US$100–150 tCO2−1 by 2050, including for states that contribute most to total national CDR. Although EW cannot be a substitute for emission reductions, our assessment strengthens the case for EW as an overlooked practical innovation for helping the USA meet net-zero 2050 goals5,6. Public awareness of EW and equity impacts of EW deployment across the USA require further exploration7,8 and we note that mobilizing an EW industry at the necessary scale could take decades.

Suggested Citation

  • David J. Beerling & Euripides P. Kantzas & Mark R. Lomas & Lyla L. Taylor & Shuang Zhang & Yoshiki Kanzaki & Rafael M. Eufrasio & Phil Renforth & Jean-Francois Mecure & Hector Pollitt & Philip B. Hold, 2025. "Transforming US agriculture for carbon removal with enhanced weathering," Nature, Nature, vol. 638(8050), pages 425-434, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:638:y:2025:i:8050:d:10.1038_s41586-024-08429-2
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-024-08429-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-08429-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-024-08429-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:638:y:2025:i:8050:d:10.1038_s41586-024-08429-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.