IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v627y2024i8004d10.1038_s41586-024-07118-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Latitudinal patterns in stabilizing density dependence of forest communities

Author

Listed:
  • Lisa Hülsmann

    (University of Bayreuth
    University of Regensburg
    University of Bayreuth)

  • Ryan A. Chisholm

    (National University of Singapore)

  • Liza Comita

    (Yale University
    Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute)

  • Marco D. Visser

    (Leiden University)

  • Melina Souza Leite

    (University of São Paulo)

  • Salomon Aguilar

    (Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute)

  • Kristina J. Anderson-Teixeira

    (Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute
    Smithsonian’s National Zoo & Conservation Biology Institute)

  • Norman A. Bourg

    (Smithsonian’s National Zoo & Conservation Biology Institute)

  • Warren Y. Brockelman

    (National Science and Technology Development Agency
    Mahidol University)

  • Sarayudh Bunyavejchewin

    (Kasetsart University)

  • Nicolas Castaño

    (Instituto Amazónico de Investigaciones Científicas Sinchi)

  • Chia-Hao Chang-Yang

    (National Sun Yat-sen University)

  • George B. Chuyong

    (University of Buea)

  • Keith Clay

    (Tulane University)

  • Stuart J. Davies

    (Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute)

  • Alvaro Duque

    (Universidad Nacional de Colombia Sede Medellín)

  • Sisira Ediriweera

    (Uva Wellassa University)

  • Corneille Ewango

    (University of Kisangani)

  • Gregory S. Gilbert

    (University of California, Santa Cruz)

  • Jan Holík

    (Silva Tarouca Research Institute)

  • Robert W. Howe

    (University of Wisconsin-Green Bay)

  • Stephen P. Hubbell

    (University of California, Los Angeles)

  • Akira Itoh

    (Osaka Metropolitan University)

  • Daniel J. Johnson

    (University of Florida)

  • David Kenfack

    (Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute)

  • Kamil Král

    (Silva Tarouca Research Institute)

  • Andrew J. Larson

    (University of Montana
    University of Montana)

  • James A. Lutz

    (Utah State University)

  • Jean-Remy Makana

    (University of Kisangani)

  • Yadvinder Malhi

    (University of Oxford)

  • Sean M. McMahon

    (Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute
    Smithsonian Environmental Research Center)

  • William J. McShea

    (Smithsonian’s National Zoo & Conservation Biology Institute)

  • Mohizah Mohamad

    (Sarawak Forest Department)

  • Musalmah Nasardin

    (Forest Research Institute Malaysia)

  • Anuttara Nathalang

    (National Science and Technology Development Agency)

  • Natalia Norden

    (Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt)

  • Alexandre A. Oliveira

    (University of São Paulo)

  • Renan Parmigiani

    (University of São Paulo)

  • Rolando Perez

    (Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute)

  • Richard P. Phillips

    (Indiana University)

  • Nantachai Pongpattananurak

    (Kasetsart University)

  • I-Fang Sun

    (National Donghwa University)

  • Mark E. Swanson

    (Washington State University)

  • Sylvester Tan

    (Sarawak Forest Department)

  • Duncan Thomas

    (Oregon State University)

  • Jill Thompson

    (UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Bush Estate)

  • Maria Uriarte

    (Columbia University)

  • Amy T. Wolf

    (University of Wisconsin-Green Bay)

  • Tze Leong Yao

    (Forest Research Institute Malaysia)

  • Jess K. Zimmerman

    (University of Puerto Rico)

  • Daniel Zuleta

    (Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute)

  • Florian Hartig

    (University of Regensburg)

Abstract

Numerous studies have shown reduced performance in plants that are surrounded by neighbours of the same species1,2, a phenomenon known as conspecific negative density dependence (CNDD)3. A long-held ecological hypothesis posits that CNDD is more pronounced in tropical than in temperate forests4,5, which increases community stabilization, species coexistence and the diversity of local tree species6,7. Previous analyses supporting such a latitudinal gradient in CNDD8,9 have suffered from methodological limitations related to the use of static data10–12. Here we present a comprehensive assessment of latitudinal CNDD patterns using dynamic mortality data to estimate species-site-specific CNDD across 23 sites. Averaged across species, we found that stabilizing CNDD was present at all except one site, but that average stabilizing CNDD was not stronger toward the tropics. However, in tropical tree communities, rare and intermediate abundant species experienced stronger stabilizing CNDD than did common species. This pattern was absent in temperate forests, which suggests that CNDD influences species abundances more strongly in tropical forests than it does in temperate ones13. We also found that interspecific variation in CNDD, which might attenuate its stabilizing effect on species diversity14,15, was high but not significantly different across latitudes. Although the consequences of these patterns for latitudinal diversity gradients are difficult to evaluate, we speculate that a more effective regulation of population abundances could translate into greater stabilization of tropical tree communities and thus contribute to the high local diversity of tropical forests.

Suggested Citation

  • Lisa Hülsmann & Ryan A. Chisholm & Liza Comita & Marco D. Visser & Melina Souza Leite & Salomon Aguilar & Kristina J. Anderson-Teixeira & Norman A. Bourg & Warren Y. Brockelman & Sarayudh Bunyavejchew, 2024. "Latitudinal patterns in stabilizing density dependence of forest communities," Nature, Nature, vol. 627(8004), pages 564-571, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:627:y:2024:i:8004:d:10.1038_s41586-024-07118-4
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-024-07118-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-07118-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-024-07118-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:627:y:2024:i:8004:d:10.1038_s41586-024-07118-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.