IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v624y2023i7990d10.1038_s41586-023-06756-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quasi-experimental evaluation of a nationwide diabetes prevention programme

Author

Listed:
  • Julia M. Lemp

    (Heidelberg University Hospital
    Stanford University)

  • Christian Bommer

    (Heidelberg University Hospital
    University of Goettingen)

  • Min Xie

    (Heidelberg University Hospital
    Stanford University)

  • Felix Michalik

    (Heidelberg University Hospital
    Stanford University)

  • Anant Jani

    (Heidelberg University Hospital
    University of Oxford)

  • Justine I. Davies

    (University of Birmingham
    Stellenbosch University
    University of the Witwatersrand)

  • Till Bärnighausen

    (Heidelberg University Hospital
    Africa Health Research Institute
    Harvard University)

  • Sebastian Vollmer

    (University of Goettingen)

  • Pascal Geldsetzer

    (Stanford University
    Stanford University
    Chan Zuckerberg Biohub—San Francisco)

Abstract

Diabetes is a leading cause of morbidity, mortality and cost of illness1,2. Health behaviours, particularly those related to nutrition and physical activity, play a key role in the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus3. Whereas behaviour change programmes (also known as lifestyle interventions or similar) have been found efficacious in controlled clinical trials4,5, there remains controversy about whether targeting health behaviours at the individual level is an effective preventive strategy for type 2 diabetes mellitus6 and doubt among clinicians that lifestyle advice and counselling provided in the routine health system can achieve improvements in health7–9. Here we show that being referred to the largest behaviour change programme for prediabetes globally (the English Diabetes Prevention Programme) is effective in improving key cardiovascular risk factors, including glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), excess body weight and serum lipid levels. We do so by using a regression discontinuity design10, which uses the eligibility threshold in HbA1c for referral to the behaviour change programme, in electronic health data from about one-fifth of all primary care practices in England. We confirm our main finding, the improvement of HbA1c, using two other quasi-experimental approaches: difference-in-differences analysis exploiting the phased roll-out of the programme and instrumental variable estimation exploiting regional variation in programme coverage. This analysis provides causal, rather than associational, evidence that lifestyle advice and counselling implemented at scale in a national health system can achieve important health improvements.

Suggested Citation

  • Julia M. Lemp & Christian Bommer & Min Xie & Felix Michalik & Anant Jani & Justine I. Davies & Till Bärnighausen & Sebastian Vollmer & Pascal Geldsetzer, 2023. "Quasi-experimental evaluation of a nationwide diabetes prevention programme," Nature, Nature, vol. 624(7990), pages 138-144, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:624:y:2023:i:7990:d:10.1038_s41586-023-06756-4
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-06756-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06756-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-023-06756-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:624:y:2023:i:7990:d:10.1038_s41586-023-06756-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.