IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v622y2023i7984d10.1038_s41586-023-06606-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bridging two insect flight modes in evolution, physiology and robophysics

Author

Listed:
  • Jeff Gau

    (Georgia Institute of Technology
    Georgia Institute of Technology)

  • James Lynch

    (University of California San Diego)

  • Brett Aiello

    (Georgia Institute of Technology
    Georgia Institute of Technology
    Seton Hill University)

  • Ethan Wold

    (Georgia Institute of Technology
    Georgia Institute of Technology)

  • Nick Gravish

    (University of California San Diego)

  • Simon Sponberg

    (Georgia Institute of Technology
    Georgia Institute of Technology)

Abstract

Since taking flight, insects have undergone repeated evolutionary transitions between two seemingly distinct flight modes1–3. Some insects neurally activate their muscles synchronously with each wingstroke. However, many insects have achieved wingbeat frequencies beyond the speed limit of typical neuromuscular systems by evolving flight muscles that are asynchronous with neural activation and activate in response to mechanical stretch2–8. These modes reflect the two fundamental ways of generating rhythmic movement: time-periodic forcing versus emergent oscillations from self-excitation8–10. How repeated evolutionary transitions have occurred and what governs the switching between these distinct modes remain unknown. Here we find that, despite widespread asynchronous actuation in insects across the phylogeny3,6, asynchrony probably evolved only once at the order level, with many reversions to the ancestral, synchronous mode. A synchronous moth species, evolved from an asynchronous ancestor, still preserves the stretch-activated muscle physiology. Numerical and robophysical analyses of a unified biophysical framework reveal that rather than a dichotomy, these two modes are two regimes of the same dynamics. Insects can transition between flight modes across a bridge in physiological parameter space. Finally, we integrate these two actuation modes into an insect-scale robot11–13 that enables transitions between modes and unlocks a new self-excited wingstroke strategy for engineered flight. Together, this framework accounts for repeated transitions in insect flight evolution and shows how flight modes can flip with changes in physiological parameters.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeff Gau & James Lynch & Brett Aiello & Ethan Wold & Nick Gravish & Simon Sponberg, 2023. "Bridging two insect flight modes in evolution, physiology and robophysics," Nature, Nature, vol. 622(7984), pages 767-774, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:622:y:2023:i:7984:d:10.1038_s41586-023-06606-3
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-06606-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06606-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-023-06606-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:622:y:2023:i:7984:d:10.1038_s41586-023-06606-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.