IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v618y2023i7966d10.1038_s41586-023-06132-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

In situ tumour arrays reveal early environmental control of cancer immunity

Author

Listed:
  • Guadalupe Ortiz-Muñoz

    (Genentech)

  • Markus Brown

    (Genentech)

  • Catherine B. Carbone

    (Genentech)

  • Ximo Pechuan-Jorge

    (Genentech)

  • Vincent Rouilly

    (Genentech)

  • Henrik Lindberg

    (Genentech)

  • Alex T. Ritter

    (Genentech)

  • Gautham Raghupathi

    (Stanford University)

  • Qianbo Sun

    (Genentech)

  • Tess Nicotra

    (Genentech)

  • Shreya R. Mantri

    (Genentech)

  • Angela Yang

    (Genentech)

  • Jonas Doerr

    (Genentech)

  • Deepti Nagarkar

    (Genentech)

  • Spyros Darmanis

    (Genentech)

  • Benjamin Haley

    (Genentech)

  • Sanjeev Mariathasan

    (Genentech)

  • Yulei Wang

    (Genentech)

  • Carlos Gomez-Roca

    (IUCT, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse)

  • Carlos Eduardo Andrea

    (Clínica Universidad de Navarra)

  • David Spigel

    (Sarah Cannon Research Institute)

  • Thomas Wu

    (Genentech)

  • Lelia Delamarre

    (Genentech)

  • Johannes Schöneberg

    (UCSD
    UCSD)

  • Zora Modrusan

    (Genentech)

  • Richard Price

    (Genentech)

  • Shannon J. Turley

    (Genentech)

  • Ira Mellman

    (Genentech)

  • Christine Moussion

    (Genentech)

Abstract

The immune phenotype of a tumour is a key predictor of its response to immunotherapy1–4. Patients who respond to checkpoint blockade generally present with immune-inflamed5–7 tumours that are highly infiltrated by T cells. However, not all inflamed tumours respond to therapy, and even lower response rates occur among tumours that lack T cells (immune desert) or that spatially exclude T cells to the periphery of the tumour lesion (immune excluded)8. Despite the importance of these tumour immune phenotypes in patients, little is known about their development, heterogeneity or dynamics owing to the technical difficulty of tracking these features in situ. Here we introduce skin tumour array by microporation (STAMP)—a preclinical approach that combines high-throughput time-lapse imaging with next-generation sequencing of tumour arrays. Using STAMP, we followed the development of thousands of arrayed tumours in vivo to show that tumour immune phenotypes and outcomes vary between adjacent tumours and are controlled by local factors within the tumour microenvironment. Particularly, the recruitment of T cells by fibroblasts and monocytes into the tumour core was supportive of T cell cytotoxic activity and tumour rejection. Tumour immune phenotypes were dynamic over time and an early conversion to an immune-inflamed phenotype was predictive of spontaneous or therapy-induced tumour rejection. Thus, STAMP captures the dynamic relationships of the spatial, cellular and molecular components of tumour rejection and has the potential to translate therapeutic concepts into successful clinical strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Guadalupe Ortiz-Muñoz & Markus Brown & Catherine B. Carbone & Ximo Pechuan-Jorge & Vincent Rouilly & Henrik Lindberg & Alex T. Ritter & Gautham Raghupathi & Qianbo Sun & Tess Nicotra & Shreya R. Mantr, 2023. "In situ tumour arrays reveal early environmental control of cancer immunity," Nature, Nature, vol. 618(7966), pages 827-833, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:618:y:2023:i:7966:d:10.1038_s41586-023-06132-2
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-06132-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06132-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-023-06132-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:618:y:2023:i:7966:d:10.1038_s41586-023-06132-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.