IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v593y2021i7860d10.1038_s41586-021-03522-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Response of the microbiome–gut–brain axis in Drosophila to amino acid deficit

Author

Listed:
  • Boram Kim

    (Seoul National University
    Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology)

  • Makoto I. Kanai

    (New York University Grossman School of Medicine)

  • Yangkyun Oh

    (New York University Grossman School of Medicine)

  • Minsoo Kyung

    (Seoul National University)

  • Eun-Kyoung Kim

    (Seoul National University)

  • In-Hwan Jang

    (Seoul National University)

  • Ji-Hoon Lee

    (Seoul National University)

  • Sang-Gyu Kim

    (Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology)

  • Greg S. B. Suh

    (Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology
    New York University Grossman School of Medicine
    KAIST Institute, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology)

  • Won-Jae Lee

    (Seoul National University)

Abstract

A balanced intake of macronutrients—protein, carbohydrate and fat—is essential for the well-being of organisms. An adequate calorific intake but with insufficient protein consumption can lead to several ailments, including kwashiorkor1. Taste receptors (T1R1–T1R3)2 can detect amino acids in the environment, and cellular sensors (Gcn2 and Tor)3 monitor the levels of amino acids in the cell. When deprived of dietary protein, animals select a food source that contains a greater proportion of protein or essential amino acids (EAAs)4. This suggests that food selection is geared towards achieving the target amount of a particular macronutrient with assistance of the EAA-specific hunger-driven response, which is poorly understood. Here we show in Drosophila that a microbiome–gut–brain axis detects a deficit of EAAs and stimulates a compensatory appetite for EAAs. We found that the neuropeptide CNMamide (CNMa)5 was highly induced in enterocytes of the anterior midgut during protein deprivation. Silencing of the CNMa–CNMa receptor axis blocked the EAA-specific hunger-driven response in deprived flies. Furthermore, gnotobiotic flies bearing an EAA-producing symbiotic microbiome exhibited a reduced appetite for EAAs. By contrast, gnotobiotic flies with a mutant microbiome that did not produce leucine or other EAAs showed higher expression of CNMa and a greater compensatory appetite for EAAs. We propose that gut enterocytes sense the levels of diet- and microbiome-derived EAAs and communicate the EAA-deprived condition to the brain through CNMa.

Suggested Citation

  • Boram Kim & Makoto I. Kanai & Yangkyun Oh & Minsoo Kyung & Eun-Kyoung Kim & In-Hwan Jang & Ji-Hoon Lee & Sang-Gyu Kim & Greg S. B. Suh & Won-Jae Lee, 2021. "Response of the microbiome–gut–brain axis in Drosophila to amino acid deficit," Nature, Nature, vol. 593(7860), pages 570-574, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:593:y:2021:i:7860:d:10.1038_s41586-021-03522-2
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-03522-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03522-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-021-03522-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yunpo Zhao & Mohammed A. Khallaf & Emilia Johansson & Najat Dzaki & Shreelatha Bhat & Johannes Alfredsson & Jianli Duan & Bill S. Hansson & Markus Knaden & Mattias Alenius, 2022. "Hedgehog-mediated gut-taste neuron axis controls sweet perception in Drosophila," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:593:y:2021:i:7860:d:10.1038_s41586-021-03522-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.