IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v577y2020i7792d10.1038_s41586-019-1923-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improved protein structure prediction using potentials from deep learning

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew W. Senior

    (DeepMind)

  • Richard Evans

    (DeepMind)

  • John Jumper

    (DeepMind)

  • James Kirkpatrick

    (DeepMind)

  • Laurent Sifre

    (DeepMind)

  • Tim Green

    (DeepMind)

  • Chongli Qin

    (DeepMind)

  • Augustin Žídek

    (DeepMind)

  • Alexander W. R. Nelson

    (DeepMind)

  • Alex Bridgland

    (DeepMind)

  • Hugo Penedones

    (DeepMind)

  • Stig Petersen

    (DeepMind)

  • Karen Simonyan

    (DeepMind)

  • Steve Crossan

    (DeepMind)

  • Pushmeet Kohli

    (DeepMind)

  • David T. Jones

    (The Francis Crick Institute
    University College London)

  • David Silver

    (DeepMind)

  • Koray Kavukcuoglu

    (DeepMind)

  • Demis Hassabis

    (DeepMind)

Abstract

Protein structure prediction can be used to determine the three-dimensional shape of a protein from its amino acid sequence1. This problem is of fundamental importance as the structure of a protein largely determines its function2; however, protein structures can be difficult to determine experimentally. Considerable progress has recently been made by leveraging genetic information. It is possible to infer which amino acid residues are in contact by analysing covariation in homologous sequences, which aids in the prediction of protein structures3. Here we show that we can train a neural network to make accurate predictions of the distances between pairs of residues, which convey more information about the structure than contact predictions. Using this information, we construct a potential of mean force4 that can accurately describe the shape of a protein. We find that the resulting potential can be optimized by a simple gradient descent algorithm to generate structures without complex sampling procedures. The resulting system, named AlphaFold, achieves high accuracy, even for sequences with fewer homologous sequences. In the recent Critical Assessment of Protein Structure Prediction5 (CASP13)—a blind assessment of the state of the field—AlphaFold created high-accuracy structures (with template modelling (TM) scores6 of 0.7 or higher) for 24 out of 43 free modelling domains, whereas the next best method, which used sampling and contact information, achieved such accuracy for only 14 out of 43 domains. AlphaFold represents a considerable advance in protein-structure prediction. We expect this increased accuracy to enable insights into the function and malfunction of proteins, especially in cases for which no structures for homologous proteins have been experimentally determined7.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew W. Senior & Richard Evans & John Jumper & James Kirkpatrick & Laurent Sifre & Tim Green & Chongli Qin & Augustin Žídek & Alexander W. R. Nelson & Alex Bridgland & Hugo Penedones & Stig Petersen, 2020. "Improved protein structure prediction using potentials from deep learning," Nature, Nature, vol. 577(7792), pages 706-710, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:577:y:2020:i:7792:d:10.1038_s41586-019-1923-7
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1923-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-019-1923-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-019-1923-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:577:y:2020:i:7792:d:10.1038_s41586-019-1923-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.