Author
Listed:
- Chengcheng Fang
(University of California San Diego)
- Jinxing Li
(University of California San Diego)
- Minghao Zhang
(University of California San Diego)
- Yihui Zhang
(University of California San Diego)
- Fan Yang
(San Diego State University)
- Jungwoo Z. Lee
(University of California San Diego)
- Min-Han Lee
(University of California San Diego)
- Judith Alvarado
(University of California San Diego
US Army Research Laboratory)
- Marshall A. Schroeder
(US Army Research Laboratory)
- Yangyuchen Yang
(University of California San Diego)
- Bingyu Lu
(University of California San Diego)
- Nicholas Williams
(San Diego State University)
- Miguel Ceja
(University of California San Diego)
- Li Yang
(General Motors Research and Development Center)
- Mei Cai
(General Motors Research and Development Center)
- Jing Gu
(San Diego State University)
- Kang Xu
(US Army Research Laboratory)
- Xuefeng Wang
(University of California San Diego)
- Ying Shirley Meng
(University of California San Diego
University of California San Diego)
Abstract
Lithium metal anodes offer high theoretical capacities (3,860 milliampere-hours per gram)1, but rechargeable batteries built with such anodes suffer from dendrite growth and low Coulombic efficiency (the ratio of charge output to charge input), preventing their commercial adoption2,3. The formation of inactive (‘dead’) lithium— which consists of both (electro)chemically formed Li+ compounds in the solid electrolyte interphase and electrically isolated unreacted metallic Li0 (refs 4,5)—causes capacity loss and safety hazards. Quantitatively distinguishing between Li+ in components of the solid electrolyte interphase and unreacted metallic Li0 has not been possible, owing to the lack of effective diagnostic tools. Optical microscopy6, in situ environmental transmission electron microscopy7,8, X-ray microtomography9 and magnetic resonance imaging10 provide a morphological perspective with little chemical information. Nuclear magnetic resonance11, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy12 and cryogenic transmission electron microscopy13,14 can distinguish between Li+ in the solid electrolyte interphase and metallic Li0, but their detection ranges are limited to surfaces or local regions. Here we establish the analytical method of titration gas chromatography to quantify the contribution of unreacted metallic Li0 to the total amount of inactive lithium. We identify the unreacted metallic Li0, not the (electro)chemically formed Li+ in the solid electrolyte interphase, as the dominant source of inactive lithium and capacity loss. By coupling the unreacted metallic Li0 content to observations of its local microstructure and nanostructure by cryogenic electron microscopy (both scanning and transmission), we also establish the formation mechanism of inactive lithium in different types of electrolytes and determine the underlying cause of low Coulombic efficiency in plating and stripping (the charge and discharge processes, respectively, in a full cell) of lithium metal anodes. We propose strategies for making lithium plating and stripping more efficient so that lithium metal anodes can be used for next-generation high-energy batteries.
Suggested Citation
Chengcheng Fang & Jinxing Li & Minghao Zhang & Yihui Zhang & Fan Yang & Jungwoo Z. Lee & Min-Han Lee & Judith Alvarado & Marshall A. Schroeder & Yangyuchen Yang & Bingyu Lu & Nicholas Williams & Migue, 2019.
"Quantifying inactive lithium in lithium metal batteries,"
Nature, Nature, vol. 572(7770), pages 511-515, August.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:nature:v:572:y:2019:i:7770:d:10.1038_s41586-019-1481-z
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1481-z
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:572:y:2019:i:7770:d:10.1038_s41586-019-1481-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.