IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v569y2019i7757d10.1038_s41586-019-1197-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fidelity benchmarks for two-qubit gates in silicon

Author

Listed:
  • W. Huang

    (The University of New South Wales)

  • C. H. Yang

    (The University of New South Wales)

  • K. W. Chan

    (The University of New South Wales)

  • T. Tanttu

    (The University of New South Wales)

  • B. Hensen

    (The University of New South Wales)

  • R. C. C. Leon

    (The University of New South Wales)

  • M. A. Fogarty

    (The University of New South Wales
    University College London)

  • J. C. C. Hwang

    (The University of New South Wales)

  • F. E. Hudson

    (The University of New South Wales)

  • K. M. Itoh

    (Keio University)

  • A. Morello

    (The University of New South Wales)

  • A. Laucht

    (The University of New South Wales)

  • A. S. Dzurak

    (The University of New South Wales)

Abstract

Universal quantum computation will require qubit technology based on a scalable platform1, together with quantum error correction protocols that place strict limits on the maximum infidelities for one- and two-qubit gate operations2,3. Although various qubit systems have shown high fidelities at the one-qubit level4–10, the only solid-state qubits manufactured using standard lithographic techniques that have demonstrated two-qubit fidelities near the fault-tolerance threshold6 have been in superconductor systems. Silicon-based quantum dot qubits are also amenable to large-scale fabrication and can achieve high single-qubit gate fidelities (exceeding 99.9 per cent) using isotopically enriched silicon11,12. Two-qubit gates have now been demonstrated in a number of systems13–15, but as yet an accurate assessment of their fidelities using Clifford-based randomized benchmarking, which uses sequences of randomly chosen gates to measure the error, has not been achieved. Here, for qubits encoded on the electron spin states of gate-defined quantum dots, we demonstrate Bell state tomography with fidelities ranging from 80 to 89 per cent, and two-qubit randomized benchmarking with an average Clifford gate fidelity of 94.7 per cent and an average controlled-rotation fidelity of 98 per cent. These fidelities are found to be limited by the relatively long gate times used here compared with the decoherence times of the qubits. Silicon qubit designs employing fast gate operations with high Rabi frequencies16,17, together with advanced pulsing techniques18, should therefore enable much higher fidelities in the near future.

Suggested Citation

  • W. Huang & C. H. Yang & K. W. Chan & T. Tanttu & B. Hensen & R. C. C. Leon & M. A. Fogarty & J. C. C. Hwang & F. E. Hudson & K. M. Itoh & A. Morello & A. Laucht & A. S. Dzurak, 2019. "Fidelity benchmarks for two-qubit gates in silicon," Nature, Nature, vol. 569(7757), pages 532-536, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:569:y:2019:i:7757:d:10.1038_s41586-019-1197-0
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1197-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-019-1197-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-019-1197-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ryan M. Jock & N. Tobias Jacobson & Martin Rudolph & Daniel R. Ward & Malcolm S. Carroll & Dwight R. Luhman, 2022. "A silicon singlet–triplet qubit driven by spin-valley coupling," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-9, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:569:y:2019:i:7757:d:10.1038_s41586-019-1197-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.