IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v560y2018i7718d10.1038_d41586-018-05968-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Unpaywall is transforming open science

Author

Listed:
  • Holly Else

Abstract

Unpaywall has become indispensable to many academics, and tie-ins with established scientific search engines could broaden its reach.

Suggested Citation

  • Holly Else, 2018. "How Unpaywall is transforming open science," Nature, Nature, vol. 560(7718), pages 290-291, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:560:y:2018:i:7718:d:10.1038_d41586-018-05968-3
    DOI: 10.1038/d41586-018-05968-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-05968-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/d41586-018-05968-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marianne Duquenne & Hélène Prost & Joachim Schöpfel & Franck Dumeignil, 2020. "Open Bioeconomy—A Bibliometric Study on the Accessibility of Articles in the Field of Bioeconomy," Publications, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-33, December.
    2. Debarshi Kumar Sanyal & Plaban Kumar Bhowmick & Partha Pratim Das & Samiran Chattopadhyay & T. Y. S. S. Santosh, 2019. "Enhancing access to scholarly publications with surrogate resources," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 121(2), pages 1129-1164, November.
    3. Federica Bologna & Angelo Iorio & Silvio Peroni & Francesco Poggi, 2023. "Do open citations give insights on the qualitative peer-review evaluation in research assessments? An analysis of the Italian National Scientific Qualification," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(1), pages 19-53, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:560:y:2018:i:7718:d:10.1038_d41586-018-05968-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.