IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v550y2017i7676d10.1038_nature24268.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhanced proofreading governs CRISPR–Cas9 targeting accuracy

Author

Listed:
  • Janice S. Chen

    (University of California)

  • Yavuz S. Dagdas

    (Biophysics Graduate Group, University of California)

  • Benjamin P. Kleinstiver

    (Molecular Pathology Unit, Center for Cancer Research, Massachusetts General Hospital
    Center for Computational and Integrative Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital
    Harvard Medical School)

  • Moira M. Welch

    (Molecular Pathology Unit, Center for Cancer Research, Massachusetts General Hospital
    Center for Computational and Integrative Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital)

  • Alexander A. Sousa

    (Molecular Pathology Unit, Center for Cancer Research, Massachusetts General Hospital
    Center for Computational and Integrative Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital)

  • Lucas B. Harrington

    (University of California)

  • Samuel H. Sternberg

    (University of California
    Columbia University)

  • J. Keith Joung

    (Molecular Pathology Unit, Center for Cancer Research, Massachusetts General Hospital
    Center for Computational and Integrative Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital
    Harvard Medical School)

  • Ahmet Yildiz

    (University of California
    University of California)

  • Jennifer A. Doudna

    (University of California
    University of California
    Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California
    Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory)

Abstract

A new engineered version of SpCas9, called HypaCas9, displays enhanced accuracy of editing without significant loss of efficiency at the desired target.

Suggested Citation

  • Janice S. Chen & Yavuz S. Dagdas & Benjamin P. Kleinstiver & Moira M. Welch & Alexander A. Sousa & Lucas B. Harrington & Samuel H. Sternberg & J. Keith Joung & Ahmet Yildiz & Jennifer A. Doudna, 2017. "Enhanced proofreading governs CRISPR–Cas9 targeting accuracy," Nature, Nature, vol. 550(7676), pages 407-410, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:550:y:2017:i:7676:d:10.1038_nature24268
    DOI: 10.1038/nature24268
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/nature24268
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/nature24268?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Behrouz Eslami-Mossallam & Misha Klein & Constantijn V. D. Smagt & Koen V. D. Sanden & Stephen K. Jones & John A. Hawkins & Ilya J. Finkelstein & Martin Depken, 2022. "A kinetic model predicts SpCas9 activity, improves off-target classification, and reveals the physical basis of targeting fidelity," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.
    2. Dawn G. L. Thean & Hoi Yee Chu & John H. C. Fong & Becky K. C. Chan & Peng Zhou & Cynthia C. S. Kwok & Yee Man Chan & Silvia Y. L. Mak & Gigi C. G. Choi & Joshua W. K. Ho & Zongli Zheng & Alan S. L. W, 2022. "Machine learning-coupled combinatorial mutagenesis enables resource-efficient engineering of CRISPR-Cas9 genome editor activities," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    3. Jianhang Yin & Rusen Lu & Changchang Xin & Yuhong Wang & Xinyu Ling & Dong Li & Weiwei Zhang & Mengzhu Liu & Wutao Xie & Lingyun Kong & Wen Si & Ping Wei & Bingbing Xiao & Hsiang-Ying Lee & Tao Liu & , 2022. "Cas9 exo-endonuclease eliminates chromosomal translocations during genome editing," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    4. Péter István Kulcsár & András Tálas & Zoltán Ligeti & Sarah Laura Krausz & Ervin Welker, 2022. "SuperFi-Cas9 exhibits remarkable fidelity but severely reduced activity yet works effectively with ABE8e," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    5. Lin Zhao & Sabrina R. T. Koseki & Rachel A. Silverstein & Nadia Amrani & Christina Peng & Christian Kramme & Natasha Savic & Martin Pacesa & Tomás C. Rodríguez & Teodora Stan & Emma Tysinger & Lauren , 2023. "PAM-flexible genome editing with an engineered chimeric Cas9," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-8, December.
    6. Jianli Tao & Daniel E. Bauer & Roberto Chiarle, 2023. "Assessing and advancing the safety of CRISPR-Cas tools: from DNA to RNA editing," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, December.
    7. Zsolt Bodai & Alena L. Bishop & Valentino M. Gantz & Alexis C. Komor, 2022. "Targeting double-strand break indel byproducts with secondary guide RNAs improves Cas9 HDR-mediated genome editing efficiencies," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    8. Annabel K. Sangree & Audrey L. Griffith & Zsofia M. Szegletes & Priyanka Roy & Peter C. DeWeirdt & Mudra Hegde & Abby V. McGee & Ruth E. Hanna & John G. Doench, 2022. "Benchmarking of SpCas9 variants enables deeper base editor screens of BRCA1 and BCL2," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, December.
    9. Péter István Kulcsár & András Tálas & Zoltán Ligeti & Eszter Tóth & Zsófia Rakvács & Zsuzsa Bartos & Sarah Laura Krausz & Ágnes Welker & Vanessza Laura Végi & Krisztina Huszár & Ervin Welker, 2023. "A cleavage rule for selection of increased-fidelity SpCas9 variants with high efficiency and no detectable off-targets," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-20, December.
    10. Colin McGaw & Anthony J. Garrity & Gabrielle Z. Munoz & Jeffrey R. Haswell & Sejuti Sengupta & Elise Keston-Smith & Pratyusha Hunnewell & Alexa Ornstein & Mishti Bose & Quinton Wessells & Noah Jakimo , 2022. "Engineered Cas12i2 is a versatile high-efficiency platform for therapeutic genome editing," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    11. Burcu Bestas & Sandra Wimberger & Dmitrii Degtev & Alexandra Madsen & Antje K. Rottner & Fredrik Karlsson & Sergey Naumenko & Megan Callahan & Julia Liz Touza & Margherita Francescatto & Carl Ivar Möl, 2023. "A Type II-B Cas9 nuclease with minimized off-targets and reduced chromosomal translocations in vivo," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.
    12. Marius Rutkauskas & Inga Songailiene & Patrick Irmisch & Felix E. Kemmerich & Tomas Sinkunas & Virginijus Siksnys & Ralf Seidel, 2022. "A quantitative model for the dynamics of target recognition and off-target rejection by the CRISPR-Cas Cascade complex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    13. Emmanuel O. Fenibo & Grace N. Ijoma & Weiz Nurmahomed & Tonderayi Matambo, 2022. "The Potential and Green Chemistry Attributes of Biopesticides for Sustainable Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-24, November.
    14. Daphne Collias & Elena Vialetto & Jiaqi Yu & Khoa Co & Éva d. H. Almási & Ann-Sophie Rüttiger & Tatjana Achmedov & Till Strowig & Chase L. Beisel, 2023. "Systematically attenuating DNA targeting enables CRISPR-driven editing in bacteria," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.
    15. Shun-Qing Liang & Pengpeng Liu & Jordan L. Smith & Esther Mintzer & Stacy Maitland & Xiaolong Dong & Qiyuan Yang & Jonathan Lee & Cole M. Haynes & Lihua Julie Zhu & Jonathan K. Watts & Erik J. Sonthei, 2022. "Genome-wide detection of CRISPR editing in vivo using GUIDE-tag," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    16. Yanbo Wang & W. Taylor Cottle & Haobo Wang & Momcilo Gavrilov & Roger S. Zou & Minh-Tam Pham & Srinivasan Yegnasubramanian & Scott Bailey & Taekjip Ha, 2022. "Achieving single nucleotide sensitivity in direct hybridization genome imaging," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.
    17. András Tálas & Dorottya A. Simon & Péter I. Kulcsár & Éva Varga & Sarah L. Krausz & Ervin Welker, 2021. "BEAR reveals that increased fidelity variants can successfully reduce the mismatch tolerance of adenine but not cytosine base editors," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, December.
    18. Giulia I. Corsi & Kunli Qu & Ferhat Alkan & Xiaoguang Pan & Yonglun Luo & Jan Gorodkin, 2022. "CRISPR/Cas9 gRNA activity depends on free energy changes and on the target PAM context," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:550:y:2017:i:7676:d:10.1038_nature24268. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.