IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v486y2012i7403d10.1038_nature11166.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Great Eruption of η Carinae

Author

Listed:
  • Kris Davidson

    (Minnesota Institute for Astrophysics, University of Minnesota)

  • Roberta M. Humphreys

    (Minnesota Institute for Astrophysics, University of Minnesota)

Abstract

Arising from A. Rest et al. Nature 482, 375–378 (2012).10.1038/nature10775 During the years 1838–1858, the very massive star η Carinae became the prototype supernova impostor: it released nearly as much light as a supernova explosion and shed an impressive amount of mass, but survived as a star1. In the standard interpretation, mass was driven outward by excess radiation pressure, persisting for several years. From a light-echo spectrum of that event, Rest et al.2 conclude that “other physical mechanisms” are required to explain it, because the gas outflow appears cooler than theoretical expectations. Here we note that (1) theory predicted a substantially lower temperature than they quoted, and (2) their inferred observational value is quite uncertain. Therefore, analyses so far do not reveal any significant contradiction between the observed spectrum and most previous discussions of the Great Eruption and its physics.

Suggested Citation

  • Kris Davidson & Roberta M. Humphreys, 2012. "The Great Eruption of η Carinae," Nature, Nature, vol. 486(7403), pages 1-1, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:486:y:2012:i:7403:d:10.1038_nature11166
    DOI: 10.1038/nature11166
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/nature11166
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/nature11166?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:486:y:2012:i:7403:d:10.1038_nature11166. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.