IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v468y2010i7327d10.1038_4681041a.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

No crisis in supply of peer reviewers

Author

Listed:
  • Tim Vines

    (Molecular Ecology, University of British Columbia)

  • Loren Rieseberg

    (Molecular Ecology, University of British Columbia)

  • Harry Smith

    (University of Leicester)

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Tim Vines & Loren Rieseberg & Harry Smith, 2010. "No crisis in supply of peer reviewers," Nature, Nature, vol. 468(7327), pages 1041-1041, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:468:y:2010:i:7327:d:10.1038_4681041a
    DOI: 10.1038/4681041a
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/4681041a
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/4681041a?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Charles W. Fox, 2017. "Difficulty of recruiting reviewers predicts review scores and editorial decisions at six journals of ecology and evolution," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 113(1), pages 465-477, October.
    2. Michail Kovanis & Raphaël Porcher & Philippe Ravaud & Ludovic Trinquart, 2016. "The Global Burden of Journal Peer Review in the Biomedical Literature: Strong Imbalance in the Collective Enterprise," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(11), pages 1-14, November.
    3. Carole J. Lee & Cassidy R. Sugimoto & Guo Zhang & Blaise Cronin, 2013. "Bias in peer review," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 64(1), pages 2-17, January.
    4. Owen L Petchey & Jeremy W Fox & Lindsay Haddon, 2014. "Imbalance in Individual Researcher's Peer Review Activities Quantified for Four British Ecological Society Journals, 2003-2010," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-4, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:468:y:2010:i:7327:d:10.1038_4681041a. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.