Author
Listed:
- Nina Veselka
(University of Western Ontario)
- David D. McErlain
(Imaging Research Laboratories, Robarts Research Institute, University of Western Ontario
University of Western Ontario)
- David W. Holdsworth
(Imaging Research Laboratories, Robarts Research Institute, University of Western Ontario
Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Western Ontario)
- Judith L. Eger
(Royal Ontario Museum, 100 Queen’s Park, Toronto, Ontario M5S 2C6, Canada)
- Rethy K. Chhem
(Medical University of Vienna
International Atomic Energy Agency, Wagramer Strasse 5PO Box 200, 1400 Vienna, Austria)
- Matthew J. Mason
(Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge)
- Kirsty L. Brain
(Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge)
- Paul A. Faure
(Neuroscience & Behaviour, McMaster University)
- M. Brock Fenton
(University of Western Ontario)
Abstract
Replying to: N. B. Simmons, K. L. Seymour, J. Habersetzer & G. F. Gunnell Nature 466, 10.1038/nature09219 (2010). We appreciate the comments of Simmons et al. 1 and welcome the new information they have provided about the oldest fossil bat, Onychonycteris finneyi, as well as their confirmation of contact between the stylohyal and tympanic bones in Myzopoda aurita, an extant laryngeal echolocator. Two skeletal features—relatively large cochleae and contact between the stylohyal and tympanic bones—identify extant bats with the capacity for laryngeal echolocation. Although the size of the cochlea can be measured in O. finneyi, the stylohyals may or may not have contacted the tympanics. Simmons et al.1 disagree with our interpretation2 of the possible contact between the stylohyal and the tympanic bone in O. finneyi, which indicated that this Eocene bat may have had the capacity for laryngeal echolocation, and have a different interpretation of our results.
Suggested Citation
Nina Veselka & David D. McErlain & David W. Holdsworth & Judith L. Eger & Rethy K. Chhem & Matthew J. Mason & Kirsty L. Brain & Paul A. Faure & M. Brock Fenton, 2010.
"Veselka et al. reply,"
Nature, Nature, vol. 466(7309), pages 9-9, August.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:nature:v:466:y:2010:i:7309:d:10.1038_nature09246
DOI: 10.1038/nature09246
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:466:y:2010:i:7309:d:10.1038_nature09246. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.