IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v463y2010i7282d10.1038_nature08745.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Non-random decay of chordate characters causes bias in fossil interpretation

Author

Listed:
  • Robert S. Sansom

    (University of Leicester)

  • Sarah E. Gabbott

    (University of Leicester)

  • Mark A. Purnell

    (University of Leicester)

Abstract

A hard look at soft fossils Our knowledge of the earliest stages in the evolution of the vertebrates is limited to what can be gleaned from fossils left by the early chordates. And as these animals were soft bodied and lacked bones and shells, the record is sparse and is dominated by relatively few exceptionally preserved specimens. The interpretation of such fossils is fraught with difficulty. Now, as if that were not sufficient, a study of the decay of modern specimens of amphioxus and ammocoetes (larval lampreys), the nearest living relatives of the early soft-bodied chordates, suggests that the loss of typically chordate characteristics during decay is non-random, and that it is the more phylogenetically informative characters that are lost most easily. Such vagaries, firmed up in the fossil record, may result in bias towards wrongly placing fossils on the chordate stem. If this decay bias is widespread, many important evolutionary episodes that are understood from the fossil record of exceptionally preserved soft-tissue remains will need careful reassessment.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert S. Sansom & Sarah E. Gabbott & Mark A. Purnell, 2010. "Non-random decay of chordate characters causes bias in fossil interpretation," Nature, Nature, vol. 463(7282), pages 797-800, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:463:y:2010:i:7282:d:10.1038_nature08745
    DOI: 10.1038/nature08745
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/nature08745
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/nature08745?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:463:y:2010:i:7282:d:10.1038_nature08745. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.