IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v460y2009i7255d10.1038_nature08224.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can the giant snake predict palaeoclimate?

Author

Listed:
  • Mark W. Denny

    (* Hopkins Marine Station of Stanford University, Ocean View Boulevard, Pacific Grove, California 93950, USA. mwdenny@stanford.edu)

  • Brent L. Lockwood

    (* Hopkins Marine Station of Stanford University, Ocean View Boulevard, Pacific Grove, California 93950, USA. mwdenny@stanford.edu)

  • George N. Somero

    (* Hopkins Marine Station of Stanford University, Ocean View Boulevard, Pacific Grove, California 93950, USA. mwdenny@stanford.edu)

Abstract

Arising from: J. J. Head et al. Nature 457, 715–717 (2009)10.1038/nature07671 ; Head et al. reply In their report on Titanoboa cerrejonensis, Head et al.1 propose that the great size of this 58 to 60 million-year-old snake (estimated length = 13 m, mass = 1,135 kg) indicates a mean annual neotropical temperature (MAT) of 30–34 °C, substantially higher than previous estimates for that period. They argue that the high MAT was necessary to compensate for the decreased mass-specific metabolic rate intrinsic to a snake of this size. However, the relationship on which Head et al.1 base their conclusion does not account for the scope of behavioural control over body temperature available to Titanoboa due to its huge mass. Our calculations suggest that because of its ability to behaviourally control its body temperature, Titanoboa cannot serve as an accurate palaeothermometer.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark W. Denny & Brent L. Lockwood & George N. Somero, 2009. "Can the giant snake predict palaeoclimate?," Nature, Nature, vol. 460(7255), pages 3-4, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:460:y:2009:i:7255:d:10.1038_nature08224
    DOI: 10.1038/nature08224
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/nature08224
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/nature08224?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:460:y:2009:i:7255:d:10.1038_nature08224. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.