Author
Listed:
- Michael D. Crisp
(School of Botany and Zoology, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 0200, Australia)
- Mary T. K. Arroyo
(Institute of Ecology and Biodiversity, University of Chile, Casilla 653, Santiago, Chile)
- Lyn G. Cook
(School of Integrative Biology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia)
- Maria A. Gandolfo
(L. H. Bailey Hortorium, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA)
- Gregory J. Jordan
(School of Plant Science, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 55, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia)
- Matt S. McGlone
(Landcare Research, PO Box 40, Lincoln 7640, New Zealand)
- Peter H. Weston
(National Herbarium of New South Wales, Mrs Macquaries Road, Sydney, New South Wales 2000, Australia)
- Mark Westoby
(Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales 2109, Australia)
- Peter Wilf
(Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA)
- H. Peter Linder
(Institute of Systematic Botany, University of Zurich)
Abstract
Niche conservatism The degree to which plants and animals retain their ancestral ecological traits and environmental distributions ('niche conservatism') is hotly debated, in part because of its relevance to the fate of modern species facing climate change. A tendency towards conservatism has been demonstrated previously on the local and regional scales, and now a study of more than 11,000 plant species from across the Southern Hemisphere confirms a similar phenomenon on a global scale. Only 3.6% of the evolutionary divergences observed involved a shift of biome, suggesting that many species have only a limited capacity to adapt to new biomes, making them particularly susceptible to ecological change.
Suggested Citation
Michael D. Crisp & Mary T. K. Arroyo & Lyn G. Cook & Maria A. Gandolfo & Gregory J. Jordan & Matt S. McGlone & Peter H. Weston & Mark Westoby & Peter Wilf & H. Peter Linder, 2009.
"Phylogenetic biome conservatism on a global scale,"
Nature, Nature, vol. 458(7239), pages 754-756, April.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:nature:v:458:y:2009:i:7239:d:10.1038_nature07764
DOI: 10.1038/nature07764
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:458:y:2009:i:7239:d:10.1038_nature07764. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.