Author
Listed:
- M. Lagos
(Steinmann-Institut, Universität Bonn, Poppelsdorfer Schloss, 53115 Bonn, Germany
Institut für Mineralogie, Universität Münster, Corrensstrasse 24, 48149 Münster, Germany)
- C. Ballhaus
(Steinmann-Institut, Universität Bonn, Poppelsdorfer Schloss, 53115 Bonn, Germany)
- C. Münker
(Steinmann-Institut, Universität Bonn, Poppelsdorfer Schloss, 53115 Bonn, Germany
Institut für Mineralogie, Universität Münster, Corrensstrasse 24, 48149 Münster, Germany)
- C. Wohlgemuth–Ueberwasser
(Steinmann-Institut, Universität Bonn, Poppelsdorfer Schloss, 53115 Bonn, Germany
Institut für Mineralogie, Universität Münster, Corrensstrasse 24, 48149 Münster, Germany)
- J. Berndt
(Institut für Mineralogie, Universität Münster, Corrensstrasse 24, 48149 Münster, Germany)
- Dmitry V. Kuzmin
(Max-Planck-Institut für Chemie, 55128 Mainz, Germany
Institute of Geology and Mineralogy SB RAS)
Abstract
A new lead on missing lead The unique lead isotope ratios of Earth's mantle — differing from those of the CI chondrite meteorites thought to have been the building blocks of the terrestrial planets — suggest that some lead was lost about 50 to 130 million years after Solar System formation. This 'missing lead' has commonly been thought to have migrated, along with a sulphide melt, to the Earth's core. This scenario assumes that lead has an affinity for sulphide. But now Lagos et al. report partitioning experiments in metal–sulphide–silicate systems that show that lead's affinities for both iron and sulphur are too low to explain the high U/Pb ratio of Earth's mantle in terms of lead pumping to the core. As an alternative, the authors propose that the missing lead may have been lost by early degassing 50 million years after Solar System formation, possibly triggered by the giant impact that resulted in the formation of the Moon.
Suggested Citation
M. Lagos & C. Ballhaus & C. Münker & C. Wohlgemuth–Ueberwasser & J. Berndt & Dmitry V. Kuzmin, 2008.
"The Earth’s missing lead may not be in the core,"
Nature, Nature, vol. 456(7218), pages 89-92, November.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:nature:v:456:y:2008:i:7218:d:10.1038_nature07375
DOI: 10.1038/nature07375
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:456:y:2008:i:7218:d:10.1038_nature07375. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.