IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v445y2007i7127d10.1038_nature05549.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does the exception prove the rule? (Reply)

Author

Listed:
  • Peter B. Reich

    (University of Minnesota)

  • Mark G. Tjoelker

    (Texas A&M University, College Station)

  • Jose-Luis Machado

    (Swarthmore College)

  • Jacek Oleksyn

    (Polish Academy of Sciences, Institute of Dendrology)

Abstract

Enquist et al. 1 raise several points that they claim cast doubt on our findings and interpretation2 regarding whole-plant relations of respiration, R, with plant mass, M, and total plant nitrogen content, N. We agree with Enquist et al. that R does not scale isometrically with M across all plants. However, their assertion that we claim that isometric scaling (R ∝ Mθ, with θ = 1) is universal in plants of all sizes is incorrect — in fact, we conclude the opposite2, noting that there is isometric scaling within individual experiments, non-isometric scaling of respiration versus mass across all data pooled, and no common relation across all data2.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter B. Reich & Mark G. Tjoelker & Jose-Luis Machado & Jacek Oleksyn, 2007. "Does the exception prove the rule? (Reply)," Nature, Nature, vol. 445(7127), pages 10-11, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:445:y:2007:i:7127:d:10.1038_nature05549
    DOI: 10.1038/nature05549
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/nature05549
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/nature05549?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:445:y:2007:i:7127:d:10.1038_nature05549. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.