IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v444y2006i7122d10.1038_nature05374.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An enigmatic long-lasting γ-ray burst not accompanied by a bright supernova

Author

Listed:
  • M. Della Valle

    (INAF, Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri)

  • G. Chincarini

    (Dipartimento di Fisica, Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca
    INAF, Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera)

  • N. Panagia

    (Space Telescope Science Institute
    Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica
    Supernova Ltd)

  • G. Tagliaferri

    (INAF, Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera)

  • D. Malesani

    (International School for Advanced Studies (SISSA/ISAS))

  • V. Testa

    (INAF, Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma)

  • D. Fugazza

    (Dipartimento di Fisica, Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca
    INAF, Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera)

  • S. Campana

    (INAF, Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera)

  • S. Covino

    (INAF, Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera)

  • V. Mangano

    (INAF, Istituto di Astrofisica Spaziale e Fisica Cosmica di Palermo)

  • L. A. Antonelli

    (INAF, Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma
    ASI Science Data Center)

  • P. D’Avanzo

    (INAF, Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera
    Università dell’Insubria)

  • K. Hurley

    (University of California, Berkeley, Space Sciences Laboratory)

  • I. F. Mirabel

    (European Southern Observatory)

  • L. J. Pellizza

    (Instituto de Astronomía y Física del Espacio (CONICET/UBA))

  • S. Piranomonte

    (INAF, Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma)

  • L. Stella

    (INAF, Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma)

Abstract

The long and the short of it The tidy classification system that divided γ-ray bursts (GRBs) into long-duration busts (lasting more than two seconds) and short may have had its day. The final nail in its coffin may be GRB 060614. Discovered on 14 June 2006 by the Burst Alert Telescope on-board the Swift satellite, this burst was long, at 102 seconds, but as reported in a clutch of papers in this issue, it has a number of properties, including the absence of an accompanying supernova, that were previously considered diagnostic of a 'short' GRB. The hunt is now on for a classification system to take account of the diversity now apparent in GRBs. In the accompanying News & Views, Bing Zhang suggests that the answer may be to adopt a Type I/Type II classification similar to that used for supernovae.

Suggested Citation

  • M. Della Valle & G. Chincarini & N. Panagia & G. Tagliaferri & D. Malesani & V. Testa & D. Fugazza & S. Campana & S. Covino & V. Mangano & L. A. Antonelli & P. D’Avanzo & K. Hurley & I. F. Mirabel & L, 2006. "An enigmatic long-lasting γ-ray burst not accompanied by a bright supernova," Nature, Nature, vol. 444(7122), pages 1050-1052, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:444:y:2006:i:7122:d:10.1038_nature05374
    DOI: 10.1038/nature05374
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/nature05374
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/nature05374?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:444:y:2006:i:7122:d:10.1038_nature05374. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.