Author
Listed:
- Masanori Iye
(National Astronomical Observatory
University of Tokyo
The Graduate University for Advanced Studies, Mitaka)
- Kazuaki Ota
(University of Tokyo)
- Nobunari Kashikawa
(National Astronomical Observatory)
- Hisanori Furusawa
(Subaru Telescope)
- Tetsuya Hashimoto
(University of Tokyo)
- Takashi Hattori
(Subaru Telescope)
- Yuichi Matsuda
(Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University)
- Tomoki Morokuma
(The Institute of Astronomy, University of Tokyo)
- Masami Ouchi
(Space Telescope Science Institute)
- Kazuhiro Shimasaku
(University of Tokyo)
Abstract
The oldest known galaxy The galaxy described on page 186 may be, for the moment, the most distant and hence oldest galaxy known. Large samples of galaxies have been found at redshifts of z∼6, but detections at earlier times tend to be uncertain and unreliable. But this 'new' old galaxy has a spectroscopic redshift of z=6.96, corresponding to just 750 million years after the Big Bang; and a Lyman-α emission line in its spectrum suggests that active star formation was under way when the Universe was only about 6% of its present age. This galaxy was detected during a survey using the Subaru Suprime-Cam on the summit of Mauna Kea. Looking at the galaxy population as a whole, the same survey produced a number density of galaxies at z≈7 that is only 18-36% that at z=6.6. A separate search for galaxies at at z∼7–8 using data from the Hubble Space Telescope yielded (conservatively) only one candidate galaxy, where 10 would be expected if there were no evolution in the galaxy population between z∼7 and z∼6. The simplest explanation for this is that the Universe is just too young to have built up many luminous galaxies at z∼7–8 by hierarchical merging of small galaxies.
Suggested Citation
Masanori Iye & Kazuaki Ota & Nobunari Kashikawa & Hisanori Furusawa & Tetsuya Hashimoto & Takashi Hattori & Yuichi Matsuda & Tomoki Morokuma & Masami Ouchi & Kazuhiro Shimasaku, 2006.
"A galaxy at a redshift z = 6.96,"
Nature, Nature, vol. 443(7108), pages 186-188, September.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:nature:v:443:y:2006:i:7108:d:10.1038_nature05104
DOI: 10.1038/nature05104
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:443:y:2006:i:7108:d:10.1038_nature05104. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.