IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v440y2006i7088d10.1038_nature04675.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Recursive syntactic pattern learning by songbirds

Author

Listed:
  • Timothy Q. Gentner

    (Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy
    University of California)

  • Kimberly M. Fenn

    (University of Chicago)

  • Daniel Margoliash

    (Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy
    University of Chicago)

  • Howard C. Nusbaum

    (University of Chicago)

Abstract

The language of birdsong Noam Chomsky's work on ‘generative grammar’ led to the concept of a set of rules that can generate a natural language with a hierarchical grammar, and the idea that this represents a uniquely human ability. In a series of experiments with European starlings, in which several types of ‘warble’ and ‘rattle’ took the place of words in a human language, the birds learnt to classify phrase structure grammars in a way that met the same criteria. Their performance can be said to be almost human on this yardstick. So if there are language processing capabilities that are uniquely human, they may be more context-free or at a higher level in the Chomsky hierarchy. Or perhaps there is no single property or processing capacity that differentiates human language from non-human communication systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Timothy Q. Gentner & Kimberly M. Fenn & Daniel Margoliash & Howard C. Nusbaum, 2006. "Recursive syntactic pattern learning by songbirds," Nature, Nature, vol. 440(7088), pages 1204-1207, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:440:y:2006:i:7088:d:10.1038_nature04675
    DOI: 10.1038/nature04675
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/nature04675
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/nature04675?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:440:y:2006:i:7088:d:10.1038_nature04675. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.