IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v440y2006i7081d10.1038_nature04297.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predator learning favours mimicry of a less-toxic model in poison frogs

Author

Listed:
  • Catherine R. Darst

    (University of Texas)

  • Molly E. Cummings

    (University of Texas)

Abstract

Don't eat me One of the earliest tests of Darwin's theory of natural selection was defensive mimicry, and this act of deception continues to cast light into hidden corners of evolutionary biology. Few frogs catch the eye like poison frogs — and such is their intent. Their garish colours advertise toxicity, and ‘cheating’ species mimic the warning coloration without the toxins to back it up. A study in the Amazonian rainforest in Ecuador has produced the surprising finding that edible frogs mimic the less toxic of two poison-frogs in the vicinity. Why mimic the less potent deterrent? The answer, discovered through learning experiments, lies in avoidance psychology. Extreme noxiousness makes predators avoid things that only slightly resemble the noxious object; however, with less severity, predator avoidance becomes specific. So the mimics of the less toxic poison frog gain total protection; they are avoided by predators learning on either the more or less toxic frogs.

Suggested Citation

  • Catherine R. Darst & Molly E. Cummings, 2006. "Predator learning favours mimicry of a less-toxic model in poison frogs," Nature, Nature, vol. 440(7081), pages 208-211, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:440:y:2006:i:7081:d:10.1038_nature04297
    DOI: 10.1038/nature04297
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/nature04297
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/nature04297?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:440:y:2006:i:7081:d:10.1038_nature04297. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.