Author
Listed:
- Brad S. Singer
(University of Wisconsin)
- Kenneth A. Hoffman
(California Polytechnic State University)
- Robert S. Coe
(University of California)
- Laurie L. Brown
(University of Massachusetts)
- Brian R. Jicha
(University of Wisconsin)
- Malcolm S. Pringle
(Massachusetts Institute of Technology)
- Annick Chauvin
(Geosciences Rennes UMR-CNRS, Campus Beaulieu)
Abstract
Reversals of the Earth's magnetic field reflect changes in the geodynamo—flow within the outer core—that generates the field. Constraining core processes or mantle properties that induce or modulate reversals requires knowing the timing and morphology of field changes that precede and accompany these reversals1,2,3,4. But the short duration of transitional field states and fragmentary nature of even the best palaeomagnetic records make it difficult to provide a timeline for the reversal process1,5. 40Ar/39Ar dating of lavas on Tahiti, long thought to record the primary part of the most recent ‘Matuyama–Brunhes’ reversal, gives an age of 795 ± 7 kyr, indistinguishable from that of lavas in Chile and La Palma that record a transition in the Earth's magnetic field, but older than the accepted age for the reversal. Only the ‘transitional’ lavas on Maui and one from La Palma (dated at 776 ± 2 kyr), agree with the astronomical age for the reversal. Here we propose that the older lavas record the onset of a geodynamo process, which only on occasion would result in polarity change. This initial instability, associated with the first of two decreases in field intensity, began ∼18 kyr before the actual polarity switch. These data support the claim6 that complete reversals require a significant period for magnetic flux to escape from the solid inner core and sufficiently weaken its stabilizing effect7.
Suggested Citation
Brad S. Singer & Kenneth A. Hoffman & Robert S. Coe & Laurie L. Brown & Brian R. Jicha & Malcolm S. Pringle & Annick Chauvin, 2005.
"Structural and temporal requirements for geomagnetic field reversal deduced from lava flows,"
Nature, Nature, vol. 434(7033), pages 633-636, March.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:nature:v:434:y:2005:i:7033:d:10.1038_nature03431
DOI: 10.1038/nature03431
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:434:y:2005:i:7033:d:10.1038_nature03431. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.