Author
Listed:
- Matthew W. Hahn
(Center for Population Biology and Section of Evolution and Ecology, University of California)
- Jason G. Mezey
(Center for Population Biology and Section of Evolution and Ecology, University of California)
- David J. Begun
(Center for Population Biology and Section of Evolution and Ecology, University of California)
- John H. Gillespie
(Center for Population Biology and Section of Evolution and Ecology, University of California)
- Andrew D. Kern
(Center for Population Biology and Section of Evolution and Ecology, University of California)
- Charles H. Langley
(Center for Population Biology and Section of Evolution and Ecology, University of California)
- Leonie C. Moyle
(Center for Population Biology and Section of Evolution and Ecology, University of California)
Abstract
Arising from: J. B. Plotkin, J. Dushoff & H. B. Fraser Nature 428, 942–945 (2004); see also communication from Nielsen et al.; Chen et al.; Plotkin et al. reply The idea that natural selection on genes might be detected using only a single genome has been put forward by Plotkin and colleagues1, who present a method that they claim can detect selection without the need for comparative data and which, if correct, would confer greater power of analysis with less information. Here we argue that their method depends on assumptions that confound their conclusions and that, even if these assumptions were valid, the authors' inferences about adaptive natural selection are unjustified.
Suggested Citation
Matthew W. Hahn & Jason G. Mezey & David J. Begun & John H. Gillespie & Andrew D. Kern & Charles H. Langley & Leonie C. Moyle, 2005.
"Codon bias and selection on single genomes,"
Nature, Nature, vol. 433(7023), pages 5-6, January.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:nature:v:433:y:2005:i:7023:d:10.1038_nature03221
DOI: 10.1038/nature03221
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:433:y:2005:i:7023:d:10.1038_nature03221. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.