Author
Abstract
Evolution can favour more than one reproductive tactic among conspecifics of the same sex1,2. Under the conditional evolutionarily stable strategy, individuals adopt the tactic that generates the highest fitness return for their status: large males guard females, whereas small males sneak copulations3,4. Tactics change at the status at which fitness benefits switch from favouring one tactic to favouring the alternative1,5. This ‘switchpoint’ is expressed in many species as a threshold between divergent morphologies3. Environmental and demographic parameters that influence the relative fitness of male tactics are predicted to determine a population's switchpoint1,5 and consequently whether the population is monomorphic or dimorphic. Here we show threshold evolution in the forceps dimorphism of the European earwig Forficula auricularia and document the transition from completely monomorphic to classical male-dimorphic populations over a distance of only 40 km. Because the superior fighting ability of the dominant morph6 will be more frequently rewarded at high encounter rates, population density is likely to be a key determinant of the relative fitness of the alternative tactics, and consequently the threshold. We show that, as predicted, population density correlates strongly with the shift in threshold, and that this factor drives the local evolution of the male dimorphism in these island populations. Our data provide evidence for the origin of phenotypic diversity within populations7,8,9, through the evolution of a switchpoint in a conditional strategy that has responded to local population density.
Suggested Citation
Joseph L. Tomkins & Gordon S. Brown, 2004.
"Population density drives the local evolution of a threshold dimorphism,"
Nature, Nature, vol. 431(7012), pages 1099-1103, October.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:nature:v:431:y:2004:i:7012:d:10.1038_nature02918
DOI: 10.1038/nature02918
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:431:y:2004:i:7012:d:10.1038_nature02918. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.